Skip to comments.
Inventor spurns burns with red-hot invention (cool!)
BayToday.ca ^
| Saturday, October 04, 2003
| Phil Novak
Posted on 11/04/2003 4:34:10 AM PST by gd124
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: basil
Am I the only one thinking we're kinda being had here?No. You just posted first.
41
posted on
11/04/2003 6:29:35 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: aruanan; gd124
I think the stuff was called "starlight". There was one scene in which a raw egg was coated with the stuff and then a blow torch was applied. The egg stayed raw. But some researchers were less than impressed with it and it never seemed to pan out.
42
posted on
11/04/2003 6:31:05 AM PST
by
techcor
(What crayon do I use to draw a blank?)
To: gd124
This is cool. I'm already interested in it.
This would make a good lining material for my blacksmith forges.
43
posted on
11/04/2003 6:31:29 AM PST
by
Johnny Gage
(Everybody is someone elses weirdo)
To: aruanan
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing -- If I remember right, some housewife developed the paste, it was all over the news a few years ago. I wonder if she sold the formula, or what happened...
The demonstration I'd really like to see is him covering a sheet of paper with the paste, torching it, then rinising off the paste to show the paper is fine.
44
posted on
11/04/2003 6:40:00 AM PST
by
kingu
(Just helping...)
To: gd124
Hurtubise has invented a physics-defying substance... No such thing. Nothing can defy the laws of physics. If this thing works as advertised, it will be because of the laws of physics, not in spite of them.
...called fire paste, which he claims eliminates the cross-transfer of heat and prevents anything coated in the substance from burning up.
Oops. Beware, attempted use of buzz-words ahead. Cross-transfer of heat? Why not just plain old heat transfer? What's with the "cross" stuff? Turgidity is not a virtue.
Still, I wouldn't want to use it on the shuttle or any spacecraft TPS, unless it was shown to be more rugged than being capable of simply washing off. You might have more than your share of accidents if that stuff washed off during powered flight (passing through moist cloud cover, for example) or during re-entry. If NASA wants to keep the shuttle fleet viable, they can't afford to lose anymore. They were deisgned for a 100-flight useful life and the two that we've lost made it to 25% or less of that projected lifetime. The others are going to have to hang in there if we're going to meet expectations.
45
posted on
11/04/2003 6:40:41 AM PST
by
chimera
To: Holly_P
To quote Commander Montgomery Scott:
Ye kenna change the laws 'o physics. . . .
But you CAN occaisionally find a loophole. From the description, this stuff, whatever it is, is nearly impermiable to heat. There's probably a good reason for it in materials science, but we'd need to know what the stuff is made of, and any special procedures for manufacture. . .
46
posted on
11/04/2003 6:46:43 AM PST
by
Salgak
(don't mind me: the orbital mind control lasers are making me write this. . .)
To: G-Bear
I used the same stuff when making knives. When I soldered on a finger guard I would smear this paste around the blade to keep it from losing it's temper.
47
posted on
11/04/2003 6:54:31 AM PST
by
dljordan
To: fqued
He needs another formula that's not water soluable, so that it can really be used outside. Imagine coating the belly of the space shuttle with this stuff and then having a Florida downpour. Ooops, got to re-coat before we can take off. In the dampness of Florida, it might not even be much of a coating. And the Shuttle needs more than just heat-resistance -- if this stuff couldn't withstand the huge air pressures encountered during re-entry, it'd just blow right off the Shuttle and leave it vulnerable.
To: Salgak
The primary method of heat transfer in non-metals is through the molecular bonds. Two things that can decrease thermal conductivity are:
1) Lots of interfaces between different materials, (e.g. a material with lots of porosity).
2)Weak molecular bonds, (which would help explain why its water soluble). See, for example, the difference in thermal conductivity between diamond and graphite. It's 10-100 times higher, even though they're both made of pure Carbon.
I'm guessing it's more of a case of getting really lucky finding a material with lots of interfaces, porosity, etc. and very weak molecular bonds.
To: sourcery; Ernest_at_the_Beach
ping
To: gd124
Sure will help with the FR flame wars.
BUMP
51
posted on
11/04/2003 8:48:00 AM PST
by
tm22721
(May the UN rest in peace)
To: Ichneumon
And not just during re-entry. Dynamic pressures are quite high during ascent. If NASA doesn't solve the debris issue during powered flight then there could be chunks of foam and other things gouging out swaths of this stuff, just like it did the tiles.
OTOH, this material might be a winner for replacement of asbestos coatings on surfaces and structural members of buildings. These days, thermal-resistant steel beams in skyscrapers might not be a bad investment to make.
52
posted on
11/04/2003 2:07:20 PM PST
by
chimera
To: avg_freeper
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.Absolutely classic! Right up there with "The Amazin' Lazer".
53
posted on
11/04/2003 2:16:43 PM PST
by
AngryJawa
("The bang is great, but the shockwave is where it’s at.")
To: Johnny Gage
a good lining material for my blacksmith forges It's probably too soft to last. You're stuck with your silica bricks or fire clay or whatever is in there now.
54
posted on
11/04/2003 2:24:09 PM PST
by
RightWhale
(Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
To: buffyt
I'm still around-blowing and going--LOL! Hope all is well with you.
55
posted on
11/04/2003 8:28:16 PM PST
by
basil
To: gd124
But will it prevent Spontaneous Human Combustion?
56
posted on
11/04/2003 8:31:38 PM PST
by
Consort
To: gd124
Law of physics? last time I remember laws where being broken in my hometown all the time! don't apply yourself to the limitation of a law you must quit before you even start. congratulations Troy, humidity is your only problem.
57
posted on
02/15/2005 7:47:43 AM PST
by
bjcnr
To: Physicist
Wondering what your take is on this?
To: Doctor Stochastic; Physicist
I think we are being had here as well. But wanted a separate opinion.
To: RadioAstronomer
Should be simple to test. Have the inventor coat his hand and arm with it, and retrieve a pebble from the bottom of a boiling cauldron.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson