I surely do !!!
.
The way I see it is that all morality is relative -- with the religious it comes from clergymen and books, as no two people can agree on what God is, so there is no true immutable source of morality (just my opinion).
I do believe in good and evil. 'Good' is doing what is helps the individual, whether or not it personally benefits you. 'Evil' is doing what is good for you, especially if it hurts other people. Bush: Good; Hillary: Bad.
I could spend a long, long time refining and expanding that statement to clear up any potential confusion. But I'm too ill at the moment to do so.
I also believe that if God exists, perhaps he deliberately does not make Himself known to certain people, so that they will act as checks against religion run amok, or, in the case of Satanists and pagans, so that they will serve as reminders to the faithful of what lies at the end of the slippery slope. Perhaps God does not like his followers to know him TOO well, or get too full of themselves.
If I could be assured that religious debates would remain civil, I'd participate in them a lot more frequently. That I do not is not an indication that I lack conviction, merely that I lack the stomach for the nastiness that too often ensues (making both believers and nonbelievers alike look pretty small).
Not very many on the "science" threads...