To: DannyTN
If two theories are plausible, science should consider them both, until one of them is disproven. And the second theory would be ... what? Has Dembski, Behe, or any other ID-ist even tried to get a critial review? See post 491
To: Virginia-American
Dembski has made some rather interesting admissions. Highlighted at this post in another thread, which has a link to the whole article:
HERE.
To: Virginia-American
I haven't had a chance to read the whole article but from the introduction, it looks like there is a whole new thread exploring this whole concept of whether ID has ponied up.
ID and Peer Review
154 posted on
11/04/2003 6:50:45 AM PST by
DannyTN
(Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson