Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Deadeye Division
The plain M&M’s, she explained, could be contaminated if made at the candy factory in a vat that previously contained M &M’s with peanuts.

Give me a break! This is ludicrous! There is NO way that the trace amounts of peanuts from a vat surface, having been mixed and diluted in another vat full of chocolate could be enough to cause a reaction. You could coat the surface of the vat with strichnine or arsenic and not have enough molecules per volume to harm anyone.

Her statement is sheer idiocy. It almost borders on Munchausen-by-proxy. I guess doing all of that really makes mom feel like she's needed...

12 posted on 11/02/2003 10:37:16 AM PST by Charles H. (The_r0nin) (The best thing about the End of the World is how many a**holes it'll eliminate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
"The plain M&M’s, she explained, could be contaminated if made at the candy factory in a vat that previously contained M &M’s with peanuts."

Read the package of a Three Musketeer bar. It states on the label it was manufactured at a plant that uses peanuts.

I used to work at a food manufacturer that made just add water pancake, pizza crust, muffin, and various batter mixes. It is possible to have cross contamination. It happened mostly in the mixer and tote containers.

Our hardest product to completely clean from the production line was the blueberry muffin mix. I took an entire shift to clean. We ran a bulk mix to flush after the cleaning and I could still smell and taste the blueberries on the first batch of the next product we would manufacture. Peanuts may pose problems.

When I was in school in the '70's a kid had a problem with bee stings. He carried a preloaded injection pen with a steroid for emergencies. No special tables no mandatory bee free areas. People are nuts.

28 posted on 11/02/2003 11:04:23 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
For a sight that is partial to elephants, it is shocking to discover how many jackasses are hanging out here..
31 posted on 11/02/2003 11:12:24 AM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If you seen yourself as other people do, you'd laugh too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
Give me a break! This is ludicrous! There is NO way that the trace amounts of peanuts from a vat surface, having been mixed and diluted in another vat full of chocolate could be enough to cause a reaction.

Actually, it could. Tests have shown that *wiped* countertops that have previously been used to prepare countertops still contain enough contamination to cause problems for sensitive individuals if their food is subsequently prepared there.

Likewise for kisses from people who have consumed nuts within the last few *hours*.

One man had a severe reaction to a donut that had been fried in the same oil that earlier had been used to fry a peanut-flavored donut.

You could coat the surface of the vat with strichnine or arsenic and not have enough molecules per volume to harm anyone.

Maybe, maybe not (in any case I'm sure you could not get the FDA to approve such facilities), but allergic reactions are different from direct poisonings. Most poisons require enough material to directly damage the body's mechanisms. Allergic reactions, on the other hand, are due to a "chain-reaction" effect, where the body's own reaction to the trigger generates larger effects, which then cause even larger effects, etc. It's more like an avalanche than an invasion. And just as a gigantic avalanche can be set off by a single footstep on the wrong part of an unstable snowpack, very small amounts off the allergen can be the trigger for a cascading sequence of bodily reactions which lead to major systemic distress (and/or death).

37 posted on 11/02/2003 11:28:30 AM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
It almost borders on Munchausen-by-proxy. I guess doing all of that really makes mom feel like she's needed...

That's it! You hit the nail on the head.

40 posted on 11/02/2003 11:40:37 AM PST by Junior ("Your superior intellects are no match for our puny weapons!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
The problem with M&M's is that there is always the possibility that a peanut M&M can get in the bag with plain M&M's. They are manufactured in the same plant so there is nothing preventing this from happening by chance. Yes this is a small chance, but just think of the number of M&M's manufactured in any one day. Even a small probability becomes a certainty when you package millions of these. Eating one misplaced M&M can kill a person, believe it or not.

I admit I previously had the same attitude about food allergies. But my 4 year old daughter has been diagnosed with a severe peanut allergy and now I must carry an Epi-Pen and carefully watch what I and other people may give her.
43 posted on 11/02/2003 11:46:35 AM PST by wsack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
There is NO way that the trace amounts of peanuts from a vat surface, having been mixed and diluted in another vat full of chocolate could be enough to cause a reaction. You could coat the surface of the vat with strichnine or arsenic and not have enough molecules per volume to harm anyone.

So I take it that you work in a scientific endeavor that studies allergens, or are you just talking out of your ass?

55 posted on 11/02/2003 12:27:15 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine (nothing good ever comes by certified mail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
"Her statement is sheer idiocy. It almost borders on Munchausen-by-proxy. I guess doing all of that really makes mom feel like she's needed..."

Food whackos are a little bit easier to tolerate than environmentalist whackos.


84 posted on 11/02/2003 1:46:38 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Screw 'the security' plan in Iraq. It's time to 'go Saddam' on their medieval asses...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
Give me a break! This is ludicrous! There is NO way that the trace amounts of peanuts from a vat surface, having been mixed and diluted in another vat full of chocolate could be enough to cause a reaction.

Back your statement up.

85 posted on 11/02/2003 1:50:14 PM PST by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
I am sure you have been reminded enough on this thread of Mark Twain's famous statement, freely rendered, that it is not what people don't know that hurts them, but what they do know that ain't so.

I find it best to not have opinions or advance hypotheses on subjects where I do not have adequate special knowledge except, of course, under press of circumstances. Not that I can maintain my own standards very well, of course!!!

93 posted on 11/02/2003 2:00:19 PM PST by Iris7 (Victory, always Victory. "Duty, Honor, Country". The first is Duty, and known only by His Grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
You do NOT know of which you speak.....my friend's child went into anaphalactic shock just by handling the bread of his first PB sandwich.

I thought the peanut allergy thing was HYPED until my friend's son had it. She ate a lot of peanut butter sandwiches when she was pregnant and he punched and kicked, but she thought it was "happy movements".

122 posted on 11/02/2003 3:10:52 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Charles H. (The_r0nin)
Second-hand peanuts. The ruse worked once.
159 posted on 11/04/2003 8:25:23 AM PST by Tall_Texan ("Is Rush a Hypocrite?" http://righteverytime2.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson