To: doug from upland; AAABEST; Ace2U; Alamo-Girl; Alas; amom; AndreaZingg; Anonymous2; ...
Rights, farms, environment ping.
Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from this list.
I don't get offended if you want to be removed.
For real time political chat - Radio Free Republic chat room
2 posted on
11/01/2003 8:26:44 PM PST by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: farmfriend
BTTT!!!!!!
13 posted on
11/02/2003 3:05:18 AM PST by
E.G.C.
To: farmfriend
This looks to me like there's some self-destruction going on in the environmental movement, of the same type going on in the democratic party. They're turning on each other. This article does not recognize that even all the money they say is spent "on the environment" is actually spent getting more land under government control. The elitists in charge of these organizations, who favor high salaries, great offices and spectacular parties for themselves, essentially want control of our lives, through control of resources (ie land).
I'm glad the author mentions that much of their fund-raising rhetoric is untrue; I wish he'd separated that 'flood of donations' into those from individuals, corporations and foundations. It's my understanding that donations from small donors to these kinds of groups have DROPPED dramatically, but foundations are lavishing money on environmental groups. Those groups are then, because of the grants, pursuing programs that meet the goals of the foundations - primarily more central control of us to build their utopian new world.
Anyway, the more dissent in the environmental movement, the better for our individual rights!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson