Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tina Benkiser Elected Texas GOP Chairman
texasgop.org ^ | 11-01-03

Posted on 11/01/2003 7:01:34 PM PST by SwinneySwitch

Tina Benkiser was overwhelmingly elected Chairman of the Republican Party of Texas today at a special meeting of the State Republican Executive Committee in Austin. She will serve the remainder of former Chairman Susan Weddington’s term, who recently resigned and was appointed President of Governor Rick Perry’s OneStar Foundation. Benkiser will seek reelection at the State Convention next June in San Antonio.

(Excerpt) Read more at texasgop.org ...


TOPICS: Announcements; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: texasgop; tinabenkiser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
See you in San Antonio.
1 posted on 11/01/2003 7:01:34 PM PST by SwinneySwitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; MeeknMing; Flyer
fyi
2 posted on 11/01/2003 7:14:19 PM PST by deport (Guess who is the SUCKER............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
Nov. 1, 2003, 1:54PM

Houston attorney becomes state GOP leader

By ARMANDO VILLAFRANCA
Copyright 2003 Houston Chronicle Austin Bureau

AUSTIN - The Texas Republican Executive Committee elected Houston attorney Tina Benkiser as next party chairwoman.

Benkiser defeated Waco attorney Gina Parker in a 36-27 vote today to serve out the term of former chairwoman Susan Weddington.

Weddington resigned the post two weeks ago to become director of the OneStar Foundation, a state office created to coordinate charitable efforts.

Benkiser will serve as interim chairwoman until the 2004 state party convention. Parker said she will challenge Benkiser for the post at the convention.

"Now, this is not a training ground its a battle ground and we need a battle-tested warrior," Benkiser told committee members. "I've been in the trenches and I know the terrain."

Benkiser said one of her first priorities will be how the Legislature handles the school finance reform issue, which is expected to come up at a called special session next spring.

She offered no proposals, however, on how the school finance should be addressed, adding that it would be premature to announce any solutions now.

The candidates, both conservative activists, cited their grassroots work with the party and their commitment to party platform issues such as pro-life and pro-family.

In her speech before the committee, Parker cited her support for the Republican vision for the state.

"That vision is pro life, it's pro family, it's based on strong conservative values, on less government, lower taxes, all these things we are united on and we stand in agreement on," Parker said.

Parker was the state party treasurer from 1998 to 2001 and a state delegate since 1984. Benkiser has served on the SREC since 1998.

Benkiser outlined a four-point plan to build on the party's gains and strengths.

She said the party needs to improve its infrastructure by improving the party's depth at the local level. She said Republicans hold only about 1,900 of the 5,000 public offices in the state and hold or control only 36 percent of the county judges and 29 percent of the commissioners courts in Texas.

She said the party can improve those numbers by providing resources and training at the local, especially in reaching out to minorities.

She said the party needs to reach Hispanics and African Americans "one person by one person" to maintain its current successes.

"We can't go ask for their votes at election time and then disappear until we ask for their votes again at election time. We've got to build relationships by spending more time in those communities," she said.

And finally, she said party needs to step up fund-raising efforts to pay for these initiatives.


3 posted on 11/01/2003 7:19:01 PM PST by deport (Guess who is the SUCKER............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: deport
Sounds good. The question is whether she will steer the self-destructive conservatives in the Texas GOP, or cheer them on.
4 posted on 11/01/2003 8:00:54 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Another question: how do Tina and Gina get along?
5 posted on 11/01/2003 8:14:11 PM PST by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I was hoping you had some indications on what her political philosophy maybe..... I thought maybe you had crossed her path along the way.
6 posted on 11/01/2003 8:38:38 PM PST by deport (Guess who is the SUCKER............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: deport
I've never met her. From what I've read she was a better choice than Gina Parker. Tina opposed the ridiculous proposition that all Texas GOP candidates sign onto the state platform.

The state platform has some pretty goofy stuff in it.

7 posted on 11/01/2003 9:19:20 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
I am personally of the belief that either of these two women would have been fine, though neither are ideal. I am therefore content with Benkiser and consider her a respectable choice who seems to have good judgment.

The problem is - and too many people fail to recognize this - it takes an entirely different type of person than your average activist to be a good party chairman. A party chairman needs to be capable of serving as a spokesman and cheerleader but also not above a little arm twisting to get things done. A chairman must also strongly adhere to and advance the party's beliefs and platforms - perhaps more than any other republican - because that is precisely what he or she is tasked to do.

Will Benkiser be able to do these things? It's too early to tell. I am confident she will be conservative, but that's all I can say for sure right now.

Unfortunately our past chairman failed miserably in many of these roles. She was elected for what ammounted to entirely the wrong reasons and she never quite grasped what she was supposed to be doing. Weddington was a sociallite who could wine and dine people into supporting her but never offered any true leadership on the issues after she got elected. She also had a way of turning on her "Jesus Button" at a moment's notice and for reasons that were often significantly less than holy. I'm told that in a matter of minutes she could go from chain-smoking political tramp to rolling around between the pews like one of those cult churches with the snakes that they show on the news. And cultish it was - Weddington has long been involved in some VERY bizarre "religious" organizations including one called "Justice at the Gate" that goes around the state apologizing to various minority groups for slavery, abusing the Indians, taking Texas from the Mexicans etc on behalf of white people and in the name of "faith." As I have noted previously, one could simply remove the biblical verses and title from this group's publications and you'd think you were reading something put out by MEChA.

Needless to say, Weddington's "Jesus Button" always got her votes at the conventions though, mainly from otherwise good and decent people who were decieved by her act. She is fortunately gone now and a strongly hope her replacement will not follow in her footsteps.

8 posted on 11/01/2003 10:38:40 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: deport
I was hoping you had some indications on what her political philosophy maybe

She is definately conservative and I find myself agreeing with her endorsements more often than not. Most of the time she has a keen eye for distinguishing the conservatives from the RINOs, with only a few I've seen that she got it wrong. She was also one of the few Houston area party leaders who supported Congressman John Carter against Peter Wareing, a wealthy businessman who had a long past of giving money to Sheila Jackson Lee and other leftists but who also suddenly claimed he was a "Christian" just in time for the election.

9 posted on 11/01/2003 10:42:05 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport
Tina and Gina cordially despise one another. Barton is going to hold on to Vice-Chair, meaning the Chair will be open only to female candidates.Right now, the only viable candidates I see are Spivey (too old) or Mellinger

The best thing I can say about the Binkheiser elevation is it means she will not chair Rules committee this time. I have sat rules committee gavel to gavel since '96. With luck, Talmadge Heflin will take it again. Failing that, possibly Milton Reister out of Georgetown. Otherwise, look for a real cat-fight over Lambert's party registration rule 44 and of course, Robert Johnson's mandatory platform compliance rule. Both are blatently illegal by Texas Election Code, but this deters neither Mr. Lambert or Mr. Johnson in the slightest.
10 posted on 11/01/2003 11:18:06 PM PST by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: deport
"Only hold 1900 out of 5,000 local offices" Here in Tom Green County we have all but two of the local offices, and we will definitely get one of those this year. We have done this locally, more in spite of than with the help of the state party. God save us from the Lambertarians.
11 posted on 11/01/2003 11:49:44 PM PST by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: deport
Thanks for the heads up !

12 posted on 11/02/2003 2:23:54 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Check out the Texas Chicken D 'RATS!: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/keyword/Redistricting)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
Susan is gone but not forgotten - and not very far away!
13 posted on 11/02/2003 6:40:00 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Freedom isn't Free - Support the Troops & Vets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GOPcapitalist
Susan is gone but not forgotten - and not very far away!
14 posted on 11/02/2003 6:42:18 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Freedom isn't Free - Support the Troops & Vets!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GopherIt
Sounds like the Republicans are going for the Barbie Doll vote.
15 posted on 11/02/2003 8:04:10 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: barkeep; GOPcapitalist
Thanks for the insights.
16 posted on 11/02/2003 8:57:19 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: barkeep
As far as platform compliance: what's your beef about requiring candidates who take the Party's money, i.e., OUR money, to adhere to the Party's positions as articulated in the Platform?
17 posted on 11/03/2003 8:17:29 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
"Sounds like the Republicans are going for the Barbie Doll vote."

Did that already when we first elected miz Weddington in '00.

Luring her into departing is one of the best things Gov. Perry has done for the GOP in Texas, after redistricting.

18 posted on 11/03/2003 8:20:25 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
For starters, it would be unethical for judicial candidates to set in stone their positions on issues which may become cases. They would either have to recuse themselves from any case they had a recorded bias on or face a serious ethical challenge. No matter, the platform compliance backers refused to grant even this concession. Next, we have done a spectacular job in my home county of electing Republicans to the local courthouse positions. Commissioners, Tax Assesor, Court at Law, we OWN Tom Green County. We did not get there by handing ammo to the Democrats. We have a less than friendly press, and the last thing I need is my candidate for Treasurer having to fend off questions about whether she truly supports returning to the gold standard or kicking the UN out of the US.

Speaking of eating up party money, if Johnson had his way on this every candidate down to and including precinct chair would have to trot through this 130 some odd question form. Who do you think is going to pay for collecting, collating retaining and disseminating this massive data base?

As I suggested to the last rules committee, if you want a candidate's position on a given issue, catch them in public and ASK THEM! If they are willing to lie to you there, why would you think they would not also lie on this damned fool form?
19 posted on 11/03/2003 12:57:16 PM PST by barkeep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: barkeep
Milton "Goebbels" Reister? You've got to be kidding?
20 posted on 11/03/2003 2:55:55 PM PST by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson