[sweetliberty]

Isn't it ironic that the same liberal idealogy that so devalues the family and the sanctity of marriage, uses the legal contract of marriage as justification for giving the decision making power over a disabled woman to someone with clear conflicts of interests who refers to another woman and her children as his "family?" This man has so blatantly violated the covenant of marriage before God that he long ago lost the right to call himself Terri's husband. I would bet that if she could, Terri would agree.

[msmagoo]

I don't see how, as a Catholic, Terri would ever approve of Michael and Jody having two kids while Michael is still married to Terri!

Is this another "right to privacy" (gag) issue that Judge Greer felt was irrelevent?!

Any impartial, unbiased guardian appointed to look out for Terri's interests would be in court demanding a divorce - I hope the new guardian takes Michael's blatant infidelity into consideration when reviewing the case. How can it be deemed irrelevent when Michael's guardianship is contested? It's evidence of his conflict of interest, for crying out loud!

[sweetliberty]

idealogy = "ideology"

Arghhhh!!!!

This is YOUR fault! It just HAS to be. I never used to make so many mistakes. And to my knowledge there is no cure. Thanks a lot!

[Theodore R.]

This man has so blatantly violated the covenant of marriage before God that he long ago lost the right to call himself Terri's husband.

Yes, you just made the point that characterizes the liberal community: "the ends (death) justify the means (recognizing the marriage bond)." Even though liberals claim to abhor that famous dictum, they use it to forward popular liberal ideas. Why can't the people of FL AND the USA see?

[First Amendment]

Isn't it ironic that the same liberal idealogy that so devalues the family and the sanctity of marriage, uses the legal contract of marriage as justification for giving the decision making power over a disabled woman to someone with clear conflicts of interests who refers to another woman and her children as his "family?"

You are making some great points!! This internal inconsistency in their philosophy reveals the bankrupt and actually psychotic basis of moral relativism. The foundation, or center, of moral relativism is a constantly shifting phantasmagoria of whatever feels good to someone or other at any given time. And anything with has a scent of eternity, or moral absolutes, terrifies and enrages them. That's why on the one hand, they hate traditional marriage and the religious concept of the husband as the head of the household, on in this situation, they have no problem giving the HINO who has a girlfriend on the side life and death control over his "wife".

It is more than psychotic, it is the face of evil.