[msmagoo]

I don't see how, as a Catholic, Terri would ever approve of Michael and Jody having two kids while Michael is still married to Terri!

Is this another "right to privacy" (gag) issue that Judge Greer felt was irrelevent?!

Any impartial, unbiased guardian appointed to look out for Terri's interests would be in court demanding a divorce - I hope the new guardian takes Michael's blatant infidelity into consideration when reviewing the case. How can it be deemed irrelevent when Michael's guardianship is contested? It's evidence of his conflict of interest, for crying out loud!

[Theodore R.]

I hope the new guardian takes Michael's blatant infidelity into consideration when reviewing the case.

Absolutely not a chance of that happening. This "bioethicist" is clintoid through and through. He will have ZERO sympathy for Terri -- he has already said as much. It's just that Demers is ALSO "too blind to see."

[supercat]

Any impartial, unbiased guardian appointed to look out for Terri's interests would be in court demanding a divorce - I hope the new guardian takes Michael's blatant infidelity into consideration when reviewing the case. How can it be deemed irrelevent when Michael's guardianship is contested? It's evidence of his conflict of interest, for crying out loud!

Unfortunately, Judge Demers has ordered that because the new statute does not explicitly state the duties of the new guardian ad litem, those duties will be restricted to conducting such investigations as are necessary to advise Governor Bush about whether to leave in effect his order regarding Terri's feeding.

Unfortunately, I don't really see a good solution here. One thing that's needed is some real legislation to protect people from judges who make findings that are clearly contrary to fact, but I don't know how such legislation can be produced quickly without it having some major flaws.