Replies

It would have been unusual for a 1st century 30 year old Jewish man not to have been married. It seems a little odd to me that if Jesus was not married that there is no mention of that fact in the Gospels. It certainly does not seem that Jesus thought that there was any reason not to get married. To the extent that it matters, it might be a good idea to place the burden of proof on the side that says that he was not married since that would have been somewhat out of the ordinary.

Clearly Simon-Peter was married at some time because Jesus cured his mother-in-law of a fever (Mark 1:29-31). As far as I know there is no mention of Simon-Peter's wife, so it seems: 1) It was unremarkable that at least one of the 12 disciples was married; and, 2) If Simon-Peter was married during the time he spent with Christ, the fact that his wife was not mentioned leads me to believe that wives of the other disciples or of Jesus himself were not sufficiently important in the eyes of the Gospel writers for them to say anything about them.

One of the tenents of Trinitarian Christian thought is that Christ was truely man. That concept poses some interesting thoughts. For instance: Did Jesus know that he was God? If so, it seems to me that it that knowledge would diminish his standing: It is much easier for Jesus to come to earth, go slumming with us riff-raff for 30 or 35 years, and get nailed to a cross, secure in the knowledge (note knowledge and not faith) that he was going to be out of there pretty soon than it is to be truly human, with all of our frailties, temptations, and doubts, and still to triumph. I do not believe that God sent us a ringer.

Perhaps, I have gone far afield, but I believe that Christians of all stripes often fail to appreciate the full significance of Jesus's being truly man rather than some man-god. If you agree with that concept, then such issues as "Was Jesus married?" become an irrelevant side-show or an unnecessary distraction.