To: Harmless Teddy Bear
And He let her suffer for 10 years while living with her only to heal her later? Bit of a stretch. Ans as thetre is no evidenve of when Mary's troubles occurred or when she was healed your speculation is just that.
It is only a theory that requires the healing to have occured after the point in time you assume the ministry began.
< pure spuculation> Marriage to Mary M was in 16CE Her troubled time was 26-27CE< /speculation> You have a problem with that?
46 posted on
11/01/2003 8:36:34 AM PST by
Oztrich Boy
(You realize, of course, this means war?" B Bunny)
To: Oztrich Boy
It is only a theory that requires the healing to have occured after the point in time you assume the ministry began. When her problems began is speculation although rooted in logic. But when she was healed is not speculation but must have been after His ministry began as it is recorded that the beginning of the signs was at Cana.
So she must have been healed after that point.
63 posted on
11/01/2003 9:17:07 AM PST by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(No matter how subtle the wizard, a knife between the shoulder blades will seriously cramp his style)
To: Oztrich Boy
I have trouble with anyone who substitues CE for BC
109 posted on
11/01/2003 12:50:28 PM PST by
Catholicguy
(MT1618 Church of Peter remains pure and spotless from all leading into error, or heretical fraud)
To: Oztrich Boy
Are you a Christian?
123 posted on
11/01/2003 2:13:51 PM PST by
stands2reason
(REWARD! Tagline missing since 10/21. Pithy, clever. Last seen in Chat. Sentimental value.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson