To: Dr. Marten
Given the relative intensities and successes at secrecy vis a vis the two governments,
it's hard for me to see the port exchange visits as
REALLY EQUAL
quid pro quo.
I suspect they got a lot more intel from us than we did from them.
Supposedly our sat intel is so much better it MIGHT not matter but I'm skeptical.
5 posted on
10/31/2003 2:33:05 PM PST by
Quix
(DEFEAT the lying, deceptive, satanic, commie, leftist, globalist oligarchy 1 associate at a time)
To: Quix
I really dont see what advantages we could gain from them in port-to-port visits.
1.We already possess far more technological advantages than the Chinese, so it's not like we have anything to gain there.
2. We already fly recon. missions on a regular basis. This provides us with a great deal of information in addtion to the inside connections that we have.
3. They are not going to be conducting any secret intel communications while in our ports due to the fact that they know we will be listening.
In short, yes, they are the ones gaining the advantage. I really do not have much more faith in Bush when it comes to China, than I did with Clinton. He may not be putting their people in the White House, but he isn't showing much of a backbone in dealing with the CCP either.
6 posted on
10/31/2003 2:52:59 PM PST by
Dr. Marten
(To be conscious that you are ignorant is a great step to knowledge)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson