Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Relationships Between Republicans And Conservatives (Cathryn Crawford)
Washington Dispatch ^ | October 31, 2003 | Cathryn Crawford

Posted on 10/31/2003 8:00:17 AM PST by Scenic Sounds

Does a Republican equal a conservative? There is an entire spectrum of beliefs embodied within those elected officials that have an (R) after their name, and most of us assume that if someone is a Republican, they are conservative. However, political parties die when they are stagnant, and so there is constant change.

To answer the conservativism question, first we have to know what the basic beliefs of conservatives really are.

Historically, their most common belief – the one issue that typically unites them – is a belief in a limited federal government. Conservatives in American tend to believe that power is best left to state and local governments – the governments that are closest to the people. They believe that these smaller governments know better what their own communities need than the more distant federal government.

Conservatives also believe that the government should have a limited fiscal policy, and that the economy runs better with as little government interference as possible. We believe that most government regulations on economic issues serve to stunt growth, and that the capitalist system works best when it is allowed to work as freely as is possible.

Conservatives believe in the rights of the individuals over the rights of the government. They also deeply believe in the idea of personal responsibility. They believe that with individual rights comes individual responsibility. With a limited government comes a limited amount of assistance for its citizens, and conservatives embrace this, because it encourages individuality and freedom from dependence.

Conservatives believe in a strong national defense, and they tend to believe that our borders should be tightly controlled. They support the military and tend to believe that our military is not well served when it is spread all over the world on peacekeeping missions.

These make up the core of conservative values. While there is room for argument within any of these, they are the foundational tenets.

Now, let’s get back to our original question. Does a Republican equal a conservative? There isn’t a simple answer, but the most obvious one is no. There is no Republican that can say that he has held to these values without fail. The problem occurs when the leaders within the Party stop making conservative values their goal.

When the foundation of a belief system is taken away, the entire system wobbles. When one tenet is taken away, the rest threaten to crumble. If Republicans cease to believe in the idea of a limited central government, it becomes easier to justify more regulation and restriction on our market system. When our troops become less of a defense force and more of a peacekeeping force, it becomes easier to justify spreading them out from country to country, which tires and stresses our military. When personal responsibility stops – anything can happen. If no one is to blame, then no one must fear consequences of what they do.

Perhaps the question really is – Should a Republican equal a conservative? For those of us that believe in the GOP, that answer is a resounding yes – but this question will be answered by the people, over a period of decades, who will give their money and their votes to the Republican Party. As the GOP moves closer to the center, there will be a day when conservatives must decide whether the Republican Party is still the party that represents them best; and if they conclude that it is not, they will have to find an alternative.

Cathryn Crawford is a student at the University of Texas.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last
To: Sloth; Dane
Maybe idealogical can be useful in denotimg the proper and logical application of idealism, as opposed to abusing it as was done in the '60s when idealism was mistaken for wisdom on a massive scale.
81 posted on 10/31/2003 9:22:29 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
"I'm wondering if there is a baseline conservativism that Republicans must have. Are certian beliefs essential?" There are, to those wishing to water down the pubby vote in 2004 so that the disillusioned degenerate democrat vote can win seats and perhaps the White House. The vote in 2004 had better be more to deny democrats back into power (that for our nation's self-preservation, first, then to hold the corroding pubby's feet to the fire). My antenna begin vibrating when I read invitations to 'purety in the pubby party.' Glad you haven't slid to that level, CC.
82 posted on 10/31/2003 9:22:33 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Well put. That's why a "conservative" like me cannot support the Drug War, yet a "conservative" like you can. Even amongst ourselves we have different interpretations of the term, and that's the point I was trying to make here.
83 posted on 10/31/2003 9:22:59 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: tpaine
Where do I sign?
84 posted on 10/31/2003 9:24:53 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
As the GOP moves closer to the center,...

Who defines the "center" and does it shift from time to time?

85 posted on 10/31/2003 9:26:15 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Both parties seem to be competing for federal power in order to exercise federal power. ;-)

I agree Look at some threads on the Republicans' proposed senior benefit. When someone says that thy are glad the RATS are obstructing it, albeit for the wrong reasons, they get jumped on like they're the anti-Christ.

86 posted on 10/31/2003 9:30:00 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I did TP, but you are not going to win votes and hearts with having a micro machination issue fetish.

Sorry, I have more faith in the American people that if they could be shown that conservatism is indeed the best road to go down, they would. Are you just giving up on the GOP having any type of platform and becoming a cult of personality?

87 posted on 10/31/2003 9:32:42 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Even the article uses phrases like "smaller government", "strong national defense", "limited fiscal policy". Smaller, stronger, more limited than ... what? Relative to what?

Good point. But let me ask you a question.

Would you apply your question to, say, the issue of "principle(s)" that is thrown around like candy around here? I mean, whenever I read someone spouting the term "principle," I ask myself "Which principles?" since the term is never completely defined.


88 posted on 10/31/2003 9:36:11 AM PST by rdb3 (We're all gonna go, but I hate to go fast. Then again, it won't be fun to stick around and go last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
That's why a "conservative classic liberal in the mold of John Locke" like me cannot support the Drug War, yet a "conservative" like you can.

Closer to the truth?

89 posted on 10/31/2003 9:40:48 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; Cathryn Crawford
the philosophy that everyone holds, but no one will vote for, small "l" libertarianism.

And it's such a shame, it was good enough for the Founders.

CC - Another fine piece.

90 posted on 10/31/2003 9:41:06 AM PST by StriperSniper (All this, of course, is simply pious fudge. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
I mean, whenever I read someone spouting the term "principle," I ask myself "Which principles?" since the term is never completely defined.

Good point. It is entirely too broad a term. For instance, we have Constitutional principles, judeo-Christian principles, fiscally responsible princples. Heck, even some Dems have principles. Wellstone and Pat Moynihan come to mind. Even though they were completely wrong, they still acted on what they felt was the right thing to do rather than out of a quest for power.

91 posted on 10/31/2003 9:41:06 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
Disgust with Clinton and a belief that a woman doesn't have the right to choose to murder her unborn children. Those two things we all share.
92 posted on 10/31/2003 9:41:14 AM PST by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Sorry, I have more faith in the American people that if they could be shown that conservatism is indeed the best road to go down, they would. Are you just giving up on the GOP having any type of platform and becoming a cult of personality?

Today, it is more of a cult of personality, than a cult of ideaology.

I am politically happy with GW Bush. Is he perfect, no? He never will be, neither will you or me be perfect.

JMO, it's called a fact of life. We will never be 110% happy, so we should just deal with that, rather than give the advantage to people who will be to, you and I, zero/null/empty set in the political arena.

93 posted on 10/31/2003 9:41:54 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: tpaine; Cathryn Crawford; All
I cannot find a single thing in post #68 to argue with.

Excellent article, Cathryn. As conservatives, we SHOULD examine these things from time to time.

94 posted on 10/31/2003 9:42:13 AM PST by Long Cut (Whiskey...oil for life's frictions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
That's why conservatives today look like the liberals of yesterday. Because it's a relative position, rather than a concrete position.

Yes, the conservatives of today are really what used to be called classic liberals.

95 posted on 10/31/2003 9:48:19 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (Algunos misterios son tan profundos y maravillosos que deben ser explorados para ser entendido.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: warchild9
Disgust with Clinton and a belief that a woman doesn't have the right to choose to murder her unborn children. Those two things we all share.

There are pro-choicers on FR. :-(

96 posted on 10/31/2003 9:48:36 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Heck, even some Dems have principles.

No, all Dems have principles. They are just principles with which we disagree. To say that Dems have no principles (which is often said around here) is fallacious.

I look at it like this: Wouldn't it be "principled" for the drug addict to get as high as he can as quick as he can?


97 posted on 10/31/2003 9:50:17 AM PST by rdb3 (We're all gonna go, but I hate to go fast. Then again, it won't be fun to stick around and go last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
I cannot find a single thing in post #68 to argue with.

It's the mission statement of the Republican Liberty Caucus.

98 posted on 10/31/2003 9:50:51 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Long Cut
I'm glad you enjoyed it.
99 posted on 10/31/2003 9:51:55 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (Algunos misterios son tan profundos y maravillosos que deben ser explorados para ser entendido.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Here's a smoking-a-cigar-in-a-public-place bump.

Nope, not in the US, home of brave, land of the free?
100 posted on 10/31/2003 9:52:18 AM PST by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO. I'm far too conservative to be a real Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson