Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rhoderic
The Second Amendment does not mention "need". No one "needs" a Corvette or a Ferrari, either. Since I'm going to use it for entirely legal purposes, the conceptr of "need" is a moot one.

However, such weapons are quite fun to shoot, are robust and reliable, and are quite versatile. They are also lightweight and easy to use and train on. Plus, the ammo is relatively inexpensive.

14 posted on 10/31/2003 6:31:40 AM PST by Long Cut (Whiskey...oil for life's frictions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Long Cut
However, such weapons are quite fun to shoot, are robust and reliable, and are quite versatile. They are also lightweight and easy to use and train on. Plus, the ammo is relatively inexpensive.

Not to mention they are also very 'modular' in their design, very easy to modify (simple to build an entire gun from a bag of parts using a few simple tools), very easy to swap uppers (thereby facilitating caliber changes) and lowers, lots of aftermarket parts available, and they represent the current "state of the art" in homeland defense, tyranny-busting, Constitutional Militia arms. Other than that, no one "needs" such a weapon, unless one takes the 2nd (or the Constitution) seriously and believes the Founders' words (paraphrased as:"the Right to Keep and Bear Arms is the bedrock of liberty."

115 posted on 10/31/2003 10:36:12 AM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson