Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Physicist
If the intelligent designer is eliminated from the "how did all things come to be" discussion, then yes, it would be meant to believe that all things happend by accident and not deliberate intent.
30 posted on 10/31/2003 8:28:05 AM PST by HankReardon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: HankReardon
If the intelligent designer is eliminated from the "how did all things come to be" discussion, then yes, it would be meant to believe that all things happend by accident and not deliberate intent.

Is the evaporation of a water droplet on a hot day an accident, or a deliberately intended event?

34 posted on 10/31/2003 8:35:50 AM PST by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: HankReardon
The Intelligent Designers existence must be taken on faith, there is no evidence that an intelligent designer exists.

Until there is evidence that shows that an intelligent designer exists, scientifically verifiable evidence, ID will not and can not be considered science.

You have faith that the Intelligent Designer exists, great, have at it, but don't call it scientific, because it's not.
36 posted on 10/31/2003 8:42:24 AM PST by Ogmios (Since when is 66 senate votes for judicial confirmations constitutional?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson