Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1 spark
Dan Brown is right. That is a chick next to Jesus in the Last Supper. It doesn't mean Mary Magdalene was at the last supper. It does mean that 1500 hundred years later, Leonardo DaVinci painted it that way.

Notice that Jesus on the Right, and the person alleged to be John on the Left are not posed naturally, but in the shape of the letter M. It's Mary Magdalene. Again, this is Da Vinci posing them in the letter M, and putting Mary Magdalene there 1500 years after Christ. It in no way means that Mary was there, or was a disciple, just that Da Vinci was part of a group who believed it to be the case.

155 posted on 10/31/2003 7:37:12 AM PST by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: dogbyte12
I purchased the DaVinci Code last week, and I am having a hell of time reading this thing. It was drummed up to be one of the best books in the past five years by a book reviewer. I cannot follow the story. It is very boring.
178 posted on 10/31/2003 8:35:19 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: dogbyte12
The person on Jesus's right is John, who was frequently portrayed as an attractive young man.

There is no evidence that DaVinci was part of any group that believed anything unorthodox about Mary Magdalene and Jesus.
213 posted on 10/31/2003 9:50:00 AM PST by Bohemund
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: dogbyte12
For the record, there is also a symbol of John the Babtist. The person on the right has an index finger pointed up. This is said to be the symbol of John the Babtist and appears in many art works.
239 posted on 10/31/2003 12:35:10 PM PST by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: dogbyte12
Dan Brown is right. That is a chick next to Jesus in the Last Supper. It doesn't mean Mary Magdalene was at the last supper. It does mean that 1500 hundred years later, Leonardo DaVinci painted it that way.

Agreed.

It in no way means that Mary was there, or was a disciple, just that Da Vinci was part of a group who believed it to be the case.

Hmmm...kinda reminds me of some of the guys in 325AD.

258 posted on 10/31/2003 9:56:31 PM PST by 1 spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

To: dogbyte12; 1 spark
That is a chick next to Jesus in the Last Supper.

I doubt it.

apart from the fact that it was customary for artists in the Italian Renaissance to portray young men with angelic beauty -- especially St. John, in thousands of examples -- there's the plain fact that the Dominican fathers whose convent refectory adjoining the Church of Santa Maria delle Grazie was the site of the da Vinci fresco were the Church's fiercest doctrinal watchdogs, charged with administration of the Roman Inquisition among other things. They'd have been the last to tolerate a gnostic myth in their dining room.

Idiotic theories like the da Vinci Code flourish only because modern man's gross ignorance of his cultural past, and his childish readiness to believe extravagant myths -- the more fanciful, the better.

303 posted on 11/05/2003 9:21:00 AM PST by Romulus (Nothing really good ever happened after 1789.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson