If science is about truth, then it cannot say that God is out of the question. If science is not about truth, then science is irrelevant.
The atheists/materialists/evolutionists have been trying to push science into this precipice of dishonesty which makes science worthless. It is trying to politicize science and thus make it a matter of opinion instead of a matter of facts and evidence.
One must ask why evolutionists, atheists and materialists are trying to do that if they supposedly have evidence for their position? The answer is that they have no evidence, that their position is completely rhetorical and that the only way they can support their viewpoint is by destroying the search for truth in science.
Laplace didn't say God was ruled out when he wrote a book on celestial mechanics which omitted mention of Him. He merely had "no need of that hypothesis." Archimedes didn't use Zeus in his law of the lever, but he didn't get any grief over it.
Then you can relax, because it doesn't say that.
If science is not about truth, then science is irrelevant.
It is about truth.
The atheists/materialists/evolutionists have been trying to push science into this precipice of dishonesty which makes science worthless. It is trying to politicize science and thus make it a matter of opinion instead of a matter of facts and evidence.
Both of your claims are false, but feel free to try to support them with evidence if you think you can.
One must ask why evolutionists, atheists and materialists are trying to do that if they supposedly have evidence for their position?
They're *not* doing that. They're only doing it in your imagination.
The answer is that they have no evidence, that their position is completely rhetorical and that the only way they can support their viewpoint is by destroying the search for truth in science.
Uh huh... We've shown you reams of evidence through countless threads, don't keep falsely claiming that we don't have any.