[gore3000]

And both your statement above and what you posted evades completely my refutation above.-me-

Read the thing before you announce you have refuted it!

You have it backwards. The post did not address my refutation. In an ice covered sea, the life we know existed before the Cambrian would have been impossible. Could not have lasted a year. The whole article by unScientific American is thus utter nonsense.

[PatrickHenry]

P L A C E M A R K E R

[VadeRetro]

You have it backwards. The post did not address my refutation.

Your refutation does not address the article. I suggest reading it to see if any further objections on your part have been anticipated before making them.

In an ice covered sea, the life we know existed before the Cambrian would have been impossible.

What do you know about the viable temperature range of Spriggina? How about Cyclomedusa? What kind of animal is this?

If you know, please tell somebody, because nobody else does!

Could not have lasted a year. The whole article by unScientific American is thus utter nonsense.

Funny how they fool so many.

[Ichneumon]

In an ice covered sea, the life we know existed before the Cambrian would have been impossible. Could not have lasted a year.

Why not?