To: Dales
So there were glaciers at the equator. The whole earth must have been covered with ice. I guess it all piled up at the high points and left the ocean basins empty, right? Sure. If not, where did all the water go?
And I also believe that they know enough to model the atmosphere and predict whether or not CO2 will concentrate in the air or be absorbed in the water. Their many successes to date in such predictions (can anyone name one?) should give us plenty of confidence in their methods.
And what does this have to do with evolution?
10 posted on
10/30/2003 5:26:14 PM PST by
Rocky
To: Rocky
If not, where did all the water go? There still would have been liquid water below the ice, because of the geothermal heat coming from the ocean floor. As is the case today, life could have been supported during these severe ice ages around the hydrothermal vents.
To: Rocky
When the current climatology models are applied to the climate as it existed in 1800 they do not accurately describe the climate in 1900.
Why then would these same climatologists believe that they can apply the same model to our current climate and expect an accurate forecast 100 years into the future?
Insanity.
21 posted on
10/30/2003 5:44:13 PM PST by
Straight Vermonter
(We secretly switched ABC news with Al-Jazeera, lets see if these people can tell the difference.)
To: Rocky
So there were glaciers at the equator.But they all disappeared because of man and production of green house gases.
SUV=BAD
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson