To: tutstar; phenn; Drk4The1; pc93; dixiegrrl; dandelion
You made an excellent point. If Felos claims BIAS, the GAL is thrown out. If Terri's counsel claims BIAS, they are denied while Judge Demers puts his money on the Executive Order/Terri's Law being overturned.
I think his statements regarding the declaratory action show BIAS by Judge Demers. DOUBLE STANDARD COULD BE USEFUL ON APPEAL...
It's now on the record that Demers is awaiting the constitional decision instead of ruling on the matter at hand standing alone. He indicated that Wolfson may never have to make any decisions regarding Terri's care. WHY, WHY, WHY? DOES JUDGE DEMERS HAVE A CRYSTAL BALL or did he borrow Stetson Law College's?
483 posted on
10/31/2003 8:06:47 PM PST by
floriduh voter
(Breaking at baynews9.com...conservative-spirit.org Visit a Local Site)
To: floriduh voter
Is Demers another of these Pinellas Co. "Republicans" or what?
To: floriduh voter
Does the "constitutional decision" come from Greer, the appeals court, for the Supreme Court? Does it not start out at the lower court and wind up at the Supreme Court in Tallahassee?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson