To: Saundra Duffy
The Judge also said per local news that "the issue of bias won't be a factor because Jay Wolfson won't actually do anything if Terri's Law is declared unconstitutional." Don't you think that's outrageous? Kickin' Terri while she's doing well? Banking on Jeb's Order being overturned? The Judge himself showed bias today by even bringing up the constitutional issues. That wasn't his charge today!!!
456 posted on
10/31/2003 7:03:33 PM PST by
floriduh voter
(Breaking at baynews9.com...conservative-spirit.org Visit a Local Site)
To: floriduh voter
Who was the judge?
To: floriduh voter
"The Judge also said per local news that "the issue of bias won't be a factor because Jay Wolfson won't actually do anything if Terri's Law is declared unconstitutional." Don't you think that's outrageous? Kickin' Terri while she's doing well? Banking on Jeb's Order being overturned? The Judge himself showed bias today by even bringing up the constitutional issues. That wasn't his charge today!!! "
I think you're right. This sounds like the judge let slip his extreme biasness. Let's make sure all the attorneys on Terri's side pick up on this - the ACLJ, Pat Anderson, and the Disabilities Organization that filed a brief.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson