Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 45Auto
One of John Taffin's famous "Taffin Tests" is about heavy loaded .41 magnum. I have actually made up some really nice 260 grain BRP hard cast copper gas check rounds and fired them in my Blackhawk. They have about the same recoil as the .44 mag.

That's the sort of thing that I was talking to JD Jones about, but after talking with some friends, they said "If you're looking to get .44 performance, why not buy a big Ruger to spare the S&W, and get a .44 so you can really go overboard! So, I did! lol

Mark

66 posted on 10/30/2003 7:23:13 PM PST by MarkL (Chiefs 8-0! Wheeeeee!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: MarkL
I shoot a lot of .44 mag as well. And some heavy loaded .45 Colt in a Casull .454 fitted with .45 Colt cylinder. My wrists and hands are beginning to show the effects of years of these rounds, so I have been looking at the .41 mag for a few years. The .41 is heading into obscurity. In fact, it probably was obsolete the day it was introduced, since it was immediately eclipsed by its bigger brother, the .44 Mag. introduced in 1956.

Still, in the Ruger Blackhawk, the .41 mag almost can be safely loaded up to .44 mag levels. The Hodgdon manual lists a 245 grain load for the .41 which is impressive. There is more metal in the revolver cylinders around the cartridge of the .41 mag vs the .44 mag; the .44 mag actually is .429" and the .41 is a true .410", so there is not much difference in the size of the hole, something to which I attribute a lot of importance. Even so, the .44 mag is on the "top of the heap", discounting the stout .45 Colt, the stouter .454 Casull and the "monster" rounds, the .475 and .500 Linebaugh (not to mention the longer Linebaugh Maximums) in terms of retail sales figures. I have recently ordered a custom Blackhawk chambered in .44 Special; John Taffin and some of the old timers still swear by this round (and probably some who swear at it)as being more versatile than the .44 mag; it all goes back to the same old "chicken and egg" argument, i.e., what's better, loading the .44 Special "up" to .44 mag levels or loading the .44 mag "down" to .44 Special levels?

For me the argument is unimportant, the better to have one of each in the safe. On an esoteric level, one could say that it is not a good idea to shoot a lot of .44 Special in the guns chambered for the .44 Mag since it could lead to a build-up of residue in the chamber just behind the chamber mouths and that this could lead to difficulties when subsequently chambering .44 mag rounds. Shooting the shorter .44 Special round in guns chambered for the .44 Mag means that the bullet has to jump further to reach the lands and this, in turn, could effect accuracy. But, then, we are talking about pistols with 7 inch or less barrel lengths that have an effective range of less than 50 yards.

69 posted on 10/31/2003 10:23:56 AM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson