Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Collected Thoughts
The Washington Dispatch ^ | October 29, 2003 | Paul M. Weyrich

Posted on 10/29/2003 11:09:28 AM PST by Scenic Sounds

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Food for thought!!
1 posted on 10/29/2003 11:09:28 AM PST by Scenic Sounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds; .38sw; 2nd amendment mama; 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; 4Godsoloved..Hegave; ...
Religious Liberties Restoration Act (S 1558) BUMP!!
2 posted on 10/29/2003 11:14:52 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
BUMP!
3 posted on 10/29/2003 11:17:15 AM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
What a wake up call 9/11 must have given Peter King:

"Item two: Rep. Peter King (R-NY), no down-the-line conservative he, nevertheless has introduced H.R. 931. His bill would repeal bi-lingual voting requirements. He would restrict Clinton’s Executive Order 13166, which requires that when federal funds are involved, information about the use of those funds must be available in any language that a citizen speaks. The Bush Justice Department is now enforcing this Executive Order, combined with the Voting Rights Act. It will lead to so much chaos it will make us nostalgic for Florida in 2000.

"King’s bill would also make English the only official language of the USA. This is a measure that I hope the Congressional leadership has the courage to take up. I say courage because the minute someone raises the issue of English being the only official language in this country he is labeled a racist. I am convinced that is why President George W. Bush didn’t repeal E.O. 13166, which even Clinton was ashamed to issue. We were positive that he would overturn this Executive Order the way he did Clinton’s cancellation of the Mexico City Policy and other issues as well. No, he is enforcing this hideous construction with an aggressiveness that even the Clinton White House did not display.

4 posted on 10/29/2003 11:20:42 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
"Congress shall make no law _____________________."

5 posted on 10/29/2003 11:24:23 AM PST by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
It seems to me that this a wrong bill. It has to be something like First Amendmend Protection Bill and require wall of separation between government and atheism.
6 posted on 10/29/2003 11:31:09 AM PST by alex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Collected "Good" Thoughts ;)
7 posted on 10/29/2003 11:36:27 AM PST by JustPiper (18 of 19 Hijackers had State issued Driver's License's !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
The bill is very well thought out, and is well within Congressional purview:

U.S. Constitution
Article III

Section 1. The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office.

Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.

In all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be party, the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. In all the other cases before mentioned, the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations as the Congress shall make.

8 posted on 10/29/2003 11:50:20 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
What a wake up call 9/11 must have given Peter King:

Yes, indeed.

9 posted on 10/29/2003 11:51:53 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Thanks for the ping.
10 posted on 10/29/2003 11:53:34 AM PST by Gelato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: alex
There is another bill sending its way through the House; one that is a bit different.

There are some great minds working on this, and the reception it is getting from Congressmen and Senators is very good.

If we help push, I look for it to pass in some form sometime next year.
11 posted on 10/29/2003 11:54:22 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
This was the wake up call for me re Peter King's wake up call:

Media Has Blood On Its' Hands, Iraq GI Tells Rep.King

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1010199/posts

Media Has Blood On Its' Hands, Iraq GI Tells Rep.King
Newsmax.com ^ | October 29, 2003 | Newsmax.com


Posted on 10/28/2003 9:57 PM PST by Lady In Blue




Reprinted from NewsMax.com
Wednesday Oct. 29, 2003; 12:12 a.m. EST

Media Has Blood on its Hands, Iraq GI Tells Rep. King

Rep. Peter King, R-NY, delivered a stark message on Tuesday from an unnamed U.S. military officer now stationed in Baghdad who believes negative press coverage of the U.S. war effort has cost American soldiers their lives.

While flying back to the U.S. aboard a military transport, King told nationally syndicated radio host Sean Hannity via satellite phone, "I promised an American colonel yesterday, an Army colonel, that [I'd relay his message]: 'There's blood on the hands of the American media.'"

"He's lost men because of the terrible reporting and it's just creating a terrible atmosphere," King said the Army colonel told him.

"The troops have tremendous morale. But unfortunately the terrorists are encouraged and the Iraqi people are being dissuaded from cooperating with the American forces because of the terrible coverage back here," King said.

The unnamed GI, who King said had two graduate degrees, shared his disturbing assessment as the two flew by helicopter from the Baghdad airport to the Al Rashid hotel.

Paraphrasing the Army colonel's words, the New York Republican said, "I just want you to know that there's blood on the hands of the American media; that my men and women are going to die because of them."

The GI's message continued, "We are winning this war and the only way we can lose this is if the American people lose their nerve and that's because of what's going on in the American media."

King said he concurred with the Army colonel's complaint, saying, "What I saw is totally different from what the American media is reporting."

Noting that he was in Baghdad during the wave of terrorist attacks this weekend, King said that, "in spite of all of that, life is virtually normal in Baghdad."

"What the media doesn't show is that the rest of Baghdad is traffic jams, markets open . . . you would have thought you were in midtown Manhattan," the New York Republican contended.

"Life is so different when you're there from the way it's being portrayed in the media."

12 posted on 10/29/2003 11:54:43 AM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Thanks for the heads up!
13 posted on 10/29/2003 11:55:05 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
A very stark message indeed.

This is one of the first times I've ever felt compelled to say this, but kudoes to Congressman King.
14 posted on 10/29/2003 11:57:08 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
His stand on the Plame/Wilson scam, shut up a lot of the phoney cry babies on that issue.
15 posted on 10/29/2003 12:00:01 PM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
English must be the official language here and those who live here must learn English

Yes, and it should be spoken like it is spoken in California - with no accent!

16 posted on 10/29/2003 12:04:03 PM PST by Scenic Sounds (Me caigo a mis rodillas y hablo a las estrellas de plata. "¿Qué misterios usted está encubriendo?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I didn't see that.

Guess I just wasn't following that psuedo-scandal very closely. ;-)
17 posted on 10/29/2003 12:04:24 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Actually the best in English in America are the people from the mid west like my wife and Lee Rogers a local conservative talk show host.

They have zero accent and can be understood by those of us with or without accents.

Lee has recorded many of the male recordings we hear on voice mail and other automated responses. My wife was urged to do this by a younger relative who was working on a voice response system for the internet.
18 posted on 10/29/2003 12:15:30 PM PST by Grampa Dave ("If you don't like change, you're going to like irrelevance even less.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Excellent post with excellent "thoughts".
19 posted on 10/29/2003 12:15:41 PM PST by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
I can detect a Midwest accent. I grant you, though, they don't have as much of an accent as some places, but California is the only spot without any accent at all. It's just pure English, as it was meant to be spoken. ;-)


20 posted on 10/29/2003 12:19:39 PM PST by Scenic Sounds (Me caigo a mis rodillas y hablo a las estrellas de plata. "¿Qué misterios usted está encubriendo?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson