Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi Wants Citizenship for Illegal Aliens
Talon News ^ | 10/28/03 | Jimmy Moore

Posted on 10/29/2003 8:34:46 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the minority leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, said she believes the recent investigation that found hundreds of illegal aliens working at Wal-Mart is nothing short of "terrorizing" that company's employees.

On Friday, federal agents entered the headquarters of Wal-Mart, Inc. in Bentonville, Arkansas as well as 60 Wal-Mart stores located across the United States to round up more than 300 illegal immigrants who were found to be employed by the retail giant.

Pelosi contends that investigating and inquiring about illegal aliens working at the nation's number one retailer creates tension for the workers.

"It instills a great deal of fear in people who are only trying to earn a living and put food on the table for their family," she told reporters on Friday during her visit to Mexico.

She says immigration laws require more accountability from employers and that workers should not be targeted for an investigation by the government, even if they are illegal immigrants.

"We think there might be a better way to go about this because the fact is that it is against the law for the employer to hire these people so there should be more focus on the employer and less in these terrorizing raids," Pelosi stated to Reuters.

The comments were made by Pelosi on Friday at the end of her three-day visit with Mexican President Vicente Fox about immigration policy and border patrols. There were four Democrats and one Republican in the entourage to Mexico.

Pelosi favors granting legalized status to illegal aliens who are working in the American economy. In fact, there are several pieces of legislation making their way through Congress that would grant U.S. residency to hundreds of thousands of illegal immigrants.

One such bill Pelosi supports is one drafted by Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT) and Rep. Howard Berman (D-CA). This bill would allow 500,000 illegal immigrants who are employed in the agriculture industry to become legal residents of the United States.

"The Agricultural Job Opportunity, Benefits, and Security Act of 2003," or H.R. 3142, has 47 co-sponsors in the House and has been referred to the House Judiciary Committee.

Pelosi says that business leaders should embrace this measure to "recognize how dependent they are on some people who may not be completely where they need to be legally." She believes businesses would suffer if these illegal immigrants were forced to go back to their native country.

Interestingly, there is an alternative bill that would deal with the problem of illegal immigrants in a different way. It was introduced in the House by Rep. Thomas Tancredo (R-CO) and would put a moratorium on all immigration for one year in an effort to reduce the number of illegal aliens residing in the United States to less than 10,000 per year.

"The Mass Immigration Reduction Act of 2003," or H.R. 946, currently has 10 cosponsors in the House and is under consideration by the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security and Claims.



TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: citizenship; illegals; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Shouldn't the real headline be "Democrats desperately need more voters"?
21 posted on 10/29/2003 10:47:58 AM PST by workerbee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigfootbob
Mexico is a defacto state now, whether we want to admit it or not.

If we made it an actual state, it would get two Senators and 160 Congressmen. Wouldn't that be great? If it were divided into 10 (or so) states, it would get 20 (or so) Senators and 160 total Congressman.

22 posted on 10/29/2003 12:14:03 PM PST by Onelifetogive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
If we made it an actual state, it would get two Senators and 160 Congressmen. Wouldn't that be great? If it were divided into 10 (or so) states, it would get 20 (or so) Senators and 160 total Congressman

And they'd probably be all RAT. Thanks but no thanks as far as statehood. Protectorate status for a generation or two (and not like Puerto Rico gets), before admission for statehood would work better, IMO.

23 posted on 10/29/2003 12:19:01 PM PST by adx (Why's it called "tourist season" if you ain't allowed to shoot 'em?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
3. Do Members take an Oath of Office when they enter the House of Representatives?
As required by Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution, Members of Congress shall be bound by oath or affirmation to support the Constitution. Representatives, delegates, and the resident commissioner all take the oath of office on the first day of the new Congress, immediately after the House has elected its Speaker. The Speaker of the House administers the oath of office as follows:
"I, (name of Member), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God."

Representatives elected in special elections during the course of a Congress generally take the oath of office on the floor of the House Chamber when the Clerk of the House has received a formal notice of the new Member's election or appointment from State government authorities. On rare occasions, because of illness or other circumstances, a Member-elect has been authorized to take the oath of office at a place other than the House. In those circumstances, the Clerk of the House sees to the proper administration of the oath.

24 posted on 10/29/2003 2:24:53 PM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
"If we made it an actual state, it would get two Senators and 160 Congressmen. Wouldn't that be great?"

Actually, it would be, IMHO. Mexico has vast natural resources and investment possibilities out the gazzo. The immigration problems we are experiencing are costing us dearly, we need a proactive solution. Annexing Mexico has the potential to equal out the costs to upper 48 states and the taxpayers that reside there.

What we are doing now and in the foreseable future isn't working, what can we do? Realistically. Don't say build a wall or put troups on the border. It won't happen, not enough "gravitas" in the electorate, unfortunately.

25 posted on 10/30/2003 8:18:02 AM PST by bigfootbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
yet have NO ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION

You one to talk about offering "no alternative solution." Ha!

26 posted on 10/30/2003 3:28:09 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
You one to talk about offering "no alternative solution."

Ah, perhaps you need to go back & read my previous post with regard to GUNS owned.

MY solution shown

27 posted on 10/31/2003 5:05:32 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection


Click here or on the pic for the full article


Pelosi Wants Citizenship for Illegal Aliens


28 posted on 11/12/2003 6:48:35 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (Will work for tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
""We think there might be a better way to go about this because the fact is that it is against the law for the employer to hire these people so there should be more focus on the employer and less in these terrorizing raids," Pelosi stated to Reuters. "

Also against the law for them to be here, but that doesn't rate, eh Nancy? Deny individual responsibility. Must only be the fault of the evil corporate giant (oh, and of course, W). This is absolute BS. She is in violation of her oath of office.

29 posted on 11/12/2003 6:57:32 AM PST by bk1000 (listed on federal no tag line list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson