Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
England led the way in outlawing the abhorrent institution of slavery. They did so without violence. I was raised to believe blessed are the peacemakers and my primary complaint about Lincoln is that he was anything but a peacemaker.


Too bad, your response to the abortion question was rather lame for anonymous cyberspace. But I will work with it to see if we can break some new ground. Lets us suppose for a moment that the abortion question was returned to the states after Roe V Wade was/ is (dare to dream) overturned.

Some states no doubt will outlaw the procedure all together and some states, no doubt will keep have "moderate" regulations, and some states will have a completely unregulated abortion market (they will wrap themselves in laisez faire language and talk about property rights no doubt.)

Would you favor invading a state, conquering its people subduing the capital and imposing a 'right to life' regime on the state/states?
65 posted on 10/29/2003 8:28:16 AM PST by JohnGalt ("the constitution as it is, the union as it was")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: JohnGalt
I told you how I felt about abortion, but I also told you I won't persue your irrelevant tangent. Until you accept the fact that ending slavery by any means was a good thing, this conversation is pointless. The South was never going to change its mind and end slavery bloodlessly.
72 posted on 10/29/2003 8:35:48 AM PST by presidio9 (gungagalunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: JohnGalt
England led the way in outlawing the abhorrent institution of slavery. They did so without violence. I was raised to believe blessed are the peacemakers and my primary complaint about Lincoln is that he was anything but a peacemaker.

Southerners would never have allowed peaceful elimination of slavery, even with compensation. Even the border states, towards the end of the war when it was obvious that slavery was on its last legs, rejected Lincoln's desperate attempts to provide for gradual, compensated emancipation.

Would you favor invading a state, conquering its people subduing the capital and imposing a 'right to life' regime on the state/states?

Do you believe pro-abortion states under such a scenario have a moral or legal right to secede, expel government officials, and wage war on the Federal government?

The imposition of antislavery regimes on the South was a result of the war the South started, not its cause.

How would you suggest dealing with a state or states that waged war on the Union?

73 posted on 10/29/2003 8:37:28 AM PST by Restorer (Never let schooling interfere with your education.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson