Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger To Aid McClintock (Arnold Goes To Bat For Fellow GOPer)
Los Angeles Times ^ | 10/29/03 | Darryl Kelly

Posted on 10/29/2003 5:57:43 AM PST by goldstategop

Republican state Sen. Tom McClintock, who refused to withdraw in favor of GOP front-runner Arnold Schwarzenegger during the recall campaign, is now supported for reelection by the governor-elect and is essentially ceded another term by his chief Democratic rival.

In a gesture of unity, Schwarzenegger offered last week to speak at a fund-raiser for the veteran Thousand Oaks lawmaker, a spokesman for the new governor said Tuesday.

"The election is over, and the time for working together to move California forward is upon us," spokesman H.D. Palmer said.

"Throughout the campaign, [Schwarzenegger] said that Sen. McClintock was a bright individual who brought a lot of constructive ideas on how to control state spending to the debate," Palmer said. "Now, [Schwarzenegger is] gathering support from all members of the Legislature as he moves forward to implement his agenda."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2004; as; catrans; endorsement; gop; mcclintock; recall; tommcclintock; transition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Arnold is being a big guy, not a sore loser and he's backing the true conservative - not a RINO. We've been hearing lots of Arnold the RINO-bashing on Free Republic. If this isn't a signal Arnold means to unite our party, I don't know what is. We all agree on the need to control state spending and make our Golden State great again.
1 posted on 10/29/2003 5:57:44 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I agree. I'm one of those who was bashing Arnie for being a RINO. This, however, is a classy move. He NEEDS people like McClintock to back him, and to help keep his conservative compass pointed at true north.
2 posted on 10/29/2003 6:09:02 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
"I'm one of those who was bashing Arnie for being a RINO. This, however, is a classy move. He NEEDS people like McClintock to back him, and to help keep his conservative compass pointed at true north."

Bump for agreement

3 posted on 10/29/2003 6:10:31 AM PST by KantianBurke (Don't Tread on Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
If this isn't a signal Arnold means to unite our party, I don't know what is.

I think AHnold means to "try" to unite everyone and in many respects is a true believer.

However, after he's been RAT bitten a few times, he may resort to his terminator roots. Time will tell..I wish Kalifornians the best and hope they get out of their mess soon. He still has that infested legislature to deal with.

4 posted on 10/29/2003 6:14:42 AM PST by evad (I don't get it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; Sabertooth
FYI ping....
5 posted on 10/29/2003 6:16:17 AM PST by eureka! (Rats and Presstitutes lie--they have to in order to survive.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Any word on what transpired in the first post-election meeting last week between Dreier and McClintock?
6 posted on 10/29/2003 6:21:24 AM PST by flamefront (To the victor go the oils. No oil or oil-money for islamofascist weapons of mass annihilation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KantianBurke; Dead Corpse
<"..conservative compass pointed at true north."

Wouldn't a true conservative compass point to the East..you know, left versus right :) (Just messin' around)

Anyway, bump for agreement on the good move

7 posted on 10/29/2003 6:21:33 AM PST by evad (Good luck Kalifornia..you've completed Phase I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"McClintock, a conservative, said he has seen nothing so far from Schwarzenegger, a social moderate, that has caused him any concern.

"So far, so good," he said."
8 posted on 10/29/2003 6:22:14 AM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
Cockroaches don't do much when the lights are on-- and Arnold brings some serious sunshine around wherever he goes. Every one of them know they'd be as unemployed as Davis right now if that had been an option on Oct. 7. They've already gotten stagefright at facing off against him-- declining to approve some last minute appointments of Davis and such. Even had Tom won, he wouldn't have the media spotlight Arnold brings with him. The legislature would have ignored him and blamed him and the media would have played along.
9 posted on 10/29/2003 6:26:07 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("We happy because when we switch on the TV you never see Saddam Hussein. That's a big happy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
Even had Tom won, he wouldn't have the media spotlight Arnold brings with him. The legislature would have ignored him and blamed him and the media would have played along.

Good points...that along with the line item veto should help AHnold pare this bunch back. I just keep in mind that he will dealing with the most virulent bunch of enviro wackos, RATus infecti politico and leftist agenda groups in history.

10 posted on 10/29/2003 6:33:49 AM PST by evad (Good luck Kalifornia..you've completed Phase I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
It's a good move. Arnold needs Tom's input on the dynamics in the State Senate. There are few Republicans with as much experience in fighting with reckless spending.
11 posted on 10/29/2003 6:34:21 AM PST by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse; goldstategop
I have met multiple liberal Democrats who are not ideological who voted for Arnold because he is a unifier and because he is untainted by special interests. We need to recognize that such is why he won. McClintock would never have received those votes. Let Arnold be Arnold because this is what put the office in Republican hands. If the only solution he accomplishes that is conservative is a fiscal solution, so be it. That is the state's most pressing problem anyway. And he might well be the reason why we have a state sweep of Assembly and Senate offices in Nov 2004.
12 posted on 10/29/2003 6:41:48 AM PST by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I can't prove it, but I suspect that there was an agreement between Tom and Arnold towards the end of the campaign. Tom stays in, drawing his voters to the polls to vote for the recall, but doesn't attack Arnold, and Arnold wins, and gives some attention to some of Tom's issues.
13 posted on 10/29/2003 6:52:20 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: evad
Yes, but consider that he is dealing with the envirowackos with a backdrop of the wildfires, especially if it turns out that any of the fires were started by ELF or their ilk.
14 posted on 10/29/2003 6:54:44 AM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
I guess this means there isn't going to be a spot for McClintock in the A.S. administration. I was kind of hoping he'd get Steve Peace's job, but oh well. He'll still have a valuable role in the State Senate.
15 posted on 10/29/2003 7:12:09 AM PST by John Jorsett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Would Tom have done the same for anyone else had he been elected? Doubt it.

Seems he was pretty self centered, looking out for #1 during his campaign bid. Glad he's gone, IMO he's dangerous. One issue politicians are wacky.

16 posted on 10/29/2003 7:23:39 AM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
...envirowackos with a backdrop of the wildfires, especially if it turns out that any of the fires were started by ELF or their ilk.

Yeah, wouldn't it be great if that proves to be the case.

I know the fire is a tragedy but how fortuitous that if it had to happen it happens when they have a govenator that will do something about it and a legislature that fears him.

17 posted on 10/29/2003 7:31:02 AM PST by evad (Good luck Kalifornia..you've completed Phase I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Hey, I'll give Mr. Schwarzenegger credit for this, he's certainly extending the olive branch and it's good of him.

Had to love this though:

Meanwhile, Assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson (D-Santa Barbara) said she would not run against McClintock, because the 19th Senate District became heavily Republican during the Legislature's 2001 redistricting process.

"My decision not to run is based upon the fact that the district was designed for Mr. McClintock's incumbency … to ensure the reelection of the right-wing incumbent," Jackson said.

Right... Hannah, let's not forget that YOUR Assembly District was designed for YOU and your Democrat successor's incumbency... to ensure the reelection of a left-wing incumbent!

18 posted on 10/29/2003 7:37:52 AM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StoneColdGOP
Here are more details from the Ventura Star newspaper:

Jackson won't run for '04 Senate seat

Democrat cites redistricting plan

By Timm Herdt, therdt@ VenturaCountyStar.com
October 29, 2003

Assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson, saying that California's redistricting plan has made it impossible for anyone except a Republican to win in the new 19th Senate District, said Tuesday she will not challenge Sen. Tom McClintock, R-Thousand Oaks, next year.

Jackson, D-Santa Barbara, will be termed out of the Assembly at the end of 2004 and it had been widely speculated that she would run against McClintock in a Senate district that now stretches up the coast from Thousand Oaks to take in the city of Ventura and much of Santa Barbara County.

But Jackson said the political reality of the new districts, designed to protect the incumbent parties, makes it impossible for a Democrat to win.

Republicans have a 43 percent to 36 percent edge in voter registration in the district.

"It was a tough decision," she said, "but the district was designed to ensure the re-election of the right-wing Republican incumbent."

When the redistricting plan was put before the Legislature in 2001, Jackson was one of a handful of Assembly Democrats to vote against it.

In the Senate, former Sen. Jack O'Connell, who represented much of the area at the time, also voted no.

The old coastal district, which had been represented by Democrats for decades, fell victim to California's demographic changes, which have seen large population increases in more politically conservative inland suburbs.

When Santa Barbara and Ventura were put in the same district as Thousand Oaks and Simi Valley, the Republican inland voters far outnumbered the plurality of Democrats along the coast.

Jackson said she does not know what she will do after her Assembly term ends, but looks forward to her final year freed from the demands of political fund-raising.

Had she run, the contest would have been one of the most expensive in the state.

Jackson said she expects some Democrat will file for the office before the filing period closes Nov. 5.

As a practical matter, her decision virtually assures McClintock's re-election.

That will have significant statewide implications, as it will free Republican political resources to be spent in other districts, making it more likely they will cut into the 25-15 Democratic majority in the Legislature's upper house.


19 posted on 10/29/2003 8:14:04 AM PST by dpwiener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
This post has been added to the… California In Transition- Must read Threads!

Want on our daily or major news ping lists? Freepmail DoctorZin

20 posted on 10/29/2003 8:22:20 AM PST by DoctorZIn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson