Skip to comments.
President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended (FLASHBACK: what he REALLY said)
WhiteHouse.gov ^
| May 1, 2003
| President George W. Bush
Posted on 10/28/2003 7:55:59 PM PST by FairOpinion
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: FairOpinion
Bookmarked for future use. Thanks!
21
posted on
10/29/2003 5:33:16 AM PST
by
Magnolia
To: Mo1
Did you listen to Sean Hannity today .. he had Congressman King from Long Island call in and discuss how things have changed in Iraq .. then he mention a soldier that was quiet thru the whole tour but then at the end came over to King and said that the american media had the blood of our soldiers on their hands because of the way they choose to report the newsHoly Mackeral!! BUMP for the soldiers 100% accurate assessment of the media's complicity in a campaign to purposely disillusion the public about our guys and our President.
Prairie
22
posted on
10/29/2003 5:37:11 AM PST
by
prairiebreeze
(Halloween night, Hildebeest will be aboard her broom scaring children & small animals.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
great list!
23
posted on
10/29/2003 5:40:25 AM PST
by
petercooper
(Proud member of the VRWC)
To: FairOpinion
ABC radio, this morning at the 8am EST news broadcast flat out lied about what the President said.
they said that almost 114 had died in hostile fire since the President "said it was over." These people are soooo dishonest .
Maybe somebody who's a real news junkie should start collecting the lies of the press about Iraq, the way Ragtime Cowgirl doessuch a beautiful job collecting the positive news.
---Army Dad ---Army Dad
To: FairOpinion
"The war on terror is not over; yet it is not endless. We do not know the day of final victory" Lying press monkeys make me ill.
To: Mo1; Freee-dame
,,,then he [Congressman King] mentioned a soldier that was quiet thru the whole tour but then at the end came over to King and said that the american media had the blood of our soldiers on their hands because of the way they choose to report the news ...
*****
This needs to be said often, especially after any appearance by a Dem presidential aspirant.
President Bush's speeches are easy to understand. His sentences have a point; they do not ramble and waffle like the words of the previous president.
He particularly called Operation Iraqi Freedom the "battle of Iraq." The war is against those who use terror to hurt others. It is not against a country.
Media types who make their living using words CAN understand these distinctions, but just like the way, in 1994, they could not bring themselves to say "Contract with America" usually saying "Contract ON America" they refuse to recognize what President Bush actually says in his speeches.
26
posted on
10/29/2003 6:08:10 AM PST
by
maica
(Rush is in my prayers)
To: boxerblues
"The only things that said "Mission Accomplished" was the banner that the sailors put up, "
===
And it IS a true statement. The MISSION of REMOVING SADDAM and FREEING IRAQ WAS ACCOMPLISHED.
To: boxerblues
The only things that said "Mission Accomplished" was the banner that the sailors put up, those who had been at sea for many many months. I'm sure the Dems wil find a way to say GWB ordered the bannerAnd so what if he ordered the banner? Their mission was accomplished
28
posted on
10/29/2003 6:41:27 AM PST
by
Kaslin
(I must remember to click on the messagebox if I want to see what I typed)
To: Kaslin
I certainly dont have a problem with the banner but the Dems do
29
posted on
10/29/2003 6:44:50 AM PST
by
boxerblues
(If you can read this.. Thank a Teacher..If you can read this in English ..Thank a US Soldier)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
The truth ~ Bump!
30
posted on
10/29/2003 7:24:28 AM PST
by
blackie
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Verrry good! That needs to be sent to talk radio and every local news station and newspaper. (The conventional media knows this but is trying to ignore it.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!!
To: maica
President Bush's speeches are easy to understand. For sure. And at his Tue. news conference, he made it clear that we are not going to be abandoning Iraq until they have a functioning democracy. He was also clear about what we have to do (train police, army, security guards, etc.) and what they have to do (write a Constitution, have elections, etc.).
That sounds like a plan to me. Not one where you can set a date certain, but one you can measure.
And yet the Dems rail that he has no plan, or is a miserable failure. Without any alternative.
Are they dumb? Or are we as dumb as they think we are?
To: FairOpinion; Ragtime Cowgirl
We have difficult work to do in Iraq. So the adults will do it, while the Dem weenies will wimp out.
Wesley Clark displays UN ceasefire he obtained by licking Kofi's feet.
34
posted on
10/29/2003 5:54:14 PM PST
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
To: Pan_Yans Wife
Lol! I didn't do anything original except to add the Dem's familiar refrain to a list from the Coalition Provisional Authority.
I couldn't do this alone. But you knew that. (^:
35
posted on
10/29/2003 7:09:33 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("Saddam Hussein is not running Iraq. He is not butchering tens of thousands of people." Rummy,10/27)
To: FairOpinion
bump
36
posted on
10/29/2003 9:19:37 PM PST
by
GOPJ
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Nicely done, !!!
37
posted on
12/09/2003 12:29:13 PM PST
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson