Skip to comments.
STOP THE ACLU FROM MURDERING TERRI SCHIAVO!!!!
FreepinforTerri
Posted on 10/24/2003 8:20:01 PM PDT by FreepinforTerri
Front line Terri supporters in Florida are urging us to contact the ACLU with the facts in Terri's case.
Call, Write: ACLU of Florida 4500 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 340 Miami, FL 33137 (305) 576-2336 General ACLU e-mail: aclufl@aclufl.org
Tell them the TRUTH. Terri wants to live. She's not in a coma. SHE HAS CIVIL LIBERTIES!!!
EVERYONE, PLEASE. FREEPERS UNITE!!!
TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: galpearse; schiavoterriaclu; terri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator
To: tr0uth
I haven't used any exclamation points in my posts.
I see you are more interested in trolling than learning anything about what you're talking about.
Sayonara.
To: tr0uth
If you don't like my eclamation points, TROLL, please post your drivel on another forum, preferably, DU, TROLL!!!!
23
posted on
10/24/2003 8:46:28 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: tr0uth
Zeke? Is that you Zeke?
24
posted on
10/24/2003 8:47:19 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home!)
To: Brad's Gramma
#20!!!!:-) Love Your Exclamation Points, Brad's Gramma!!!!:-)
25
posted on
10/24/2003 8:47:35 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: EternalVigilance
I think there are good reasons the ACLU should back away from this case. This is not a right-to-die case. You just have to put it in terms they understand.
26
posted on
10/24/2003 8:48:20 PM PDT
by
nickcarraway
(www.terrisfight.org)
To: Defender2
ROFL
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
To: Defender2
!!!!!!?????????!!!!!!!!!!????????????
29
posted on
10/24/2003 8:49:14 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home!)
To: EternalVigilance
Bump
To: JohnHuang2
You did that wrong.
It was to be
BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
31
posted on
10/24/2003 8:50:23 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home!)
To: EternalVigilance
Thanks for the heads up!
To: tr0uth
How is the ACLU "murdering" Terri Schiavo? You do not help your cause by making such wild and easily disproven accusations. Michael Schiavo is seeking to have the state deprive his wife of food and water for the purpose of killing her. The media is portraying this as a "right to die" case, ignoring the facts that his wife is definitely not comatose and does not even seem to fit normal definitions of "permanent vegetative state"; his wife has parents and siblings who want to care for her; the husband has actively blocked any rehabilitative treatments; and the husband has shacked up with another woman and fathered two children by her, yet refuses to divorce his wife.
I would say that Michael Schiavo is trying to murder his wife. The ACLU, by taking Michael's side, is arguing that he should be able to murder his wife.
33
posted on
10/24/2003 8:52:23 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: Brad's Gramma
BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
;-)
To: nickcarraway
You're right. It isn't a 'right-to-die' case. It is clearly a right-to-life case.
You are also right that there are arguments that could be quite forceful in getting them to MAYBE reconsider.
Maybe Dick Armey or someone---don't I remember that he had gone to work for them?
To: tr0uth
Since I gather your a Party Of Death demoCommiecRAT Sympathizer, TROLL, I am not going to answer your question that YOU DID NOT ASK ME IN THE FIRST PLACE, TROLL!!!! I ASKED MY QUESTION DIRECTLY TO YOU, TROLL!!!! SINCE YOU WON'T ANSWER MY QUESTION THAT I POISED DIRECTLY TO YOU, NEWBIE TROLL, I AM GOING TO IGNORE YOUR POSTS AND ADVISE ALL OTHERS ON THIS THREAD TO IGNORE YOURS AS WELL!!!!
36
posted on
10/24/2003 8:53:02 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
Hmm... what ever happened to the Tr0uth?
37
posted on
10/24/2003 8:53:47 PM PDT
by
supercat
(Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
To: JohnHuang2
SO much better!!!!!!!!
I was almost ready to hit the Abuse button on you for lack of explanation points!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Carry on!!!!!!!!!!!!!
38
posted on
10/24/2003 8:54:08 PM PDT
by
Brad’s Gramma
(Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home! Logan's Home!)
To: EternalVigilance
You are also right that there are arguments that could be quite forceful in getting them to MAYBE reconsider.We have to say this is not a right-to-die case, this is a case about Terri's civil rights and if she is reduced to being her husband's property. Terri's rights, not Michael's. And of course, the ``death penalty'' angle is a good one to play.
39
posted on
10/24/2003 8:54:52 PM PDT
by
nickcarraway
(www.terrisfight.org)
To: supercat
Nice synopsis, Cat!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
40
posted on
10/24/2003 8:57:05 PM PDT
by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson