Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arctic ice cap melting at worrying rate: NASA
Yahoo! News ^ | 10/24/2003

Posted on 10/24/2003 2:37:14 PM PDT by jazzo

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The polar ice cap is melting at an alarming rate due to global warming (news - web sites), according to NASA (news - web sites) scientists, with satellite images showing the ice cap has been shrinking by 10 percent per decade over the past quarter century.

AFP-NASA/File Photo

"It is happening now. We cannot afford to wait a long period of time for technological solutions," said David Rind of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.

"Change is in the air -- literally," he told a press conference here Thursday.

By means of a special satellite launched last year to measure the thickness of the polar ice cap, NASA has confirmed that part of the Arctic Ocean that remains frozen all year round shrank at a rate of 10 percent per decade since 1980, NASA researcher Josefino Comiso said.

"The extent of Arctic sea ice that remains frozen all year reached record lows in 2002 and 2003," he added.

The polar ice cap expands in winter and contracts in spring and summer. The part of the ice cap that never melts, even in the warmest summers, is called the "perennial sea ice."

The oceans and land masses surrounding the Arctic Ocean have warmed one degree Celsius (two degrees Fahrenheit) during the past decade, scientists said.

Researchers at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration are worried because global warming speeds up as the ice cap melts, forming a vicious cycle.

"Snow and sea-ice are highly reflective because they are white," Comiso said.

"Most of the sun's energy is simply reflected back to space. With retraction of the ice cover, that means that less of surface is covered by this highly reflective snow and sea ice, and so more energy has been absorbed and the climate warms."

The warming trend has brought spectacular consequences. US and Canadian scientists reported in September that the largest ice shelf in the Arctic off Canada's coast has broken up due to climate change and could endanger shipping and drilling platforms in the Beaufort Sea.

The Ward Hunt Ice Shelf had been in place on the north coast of Ellesmere Island in Canada's Nunavut territory for at least 3,000 years.

"Small changes in ice could mean big impacts on the water cycle and ultimately the global climate," warned NASA.

The changes could alter ocean currents, the distribution of fish populations and precipitation averages over a wide area.

"One activity in the north is hunting of marine animals using sea-ice as a platform. When sea-ice retreats, it affects the communities up there," said University of Washington oceanographer Michael Seteele.

"The Arctic is changing rapidly. We should be concerned in the sense we need to simply recognize the change is here, is occurring and we may have to adapt to it," University of Colorado researcher Mark Serreze told reporters.

"Why the increase in global temperature?" he asked.

"Part of this is probably simply due to natural variability in the climate system," he added. "But the general consensus of the climate community is that part these changes are due to human impact."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; environment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: jazzo
When the concern was global cooling, there was serioius scientific discussion of painting the ice caps black so they would melt. Conversely, now we are talking global cooling, may I suggest we paint the ice capes white to reflect the heat.....
21 posted on 10/24/2003 3:22:16 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazzo
Why don't we send all the scientists to the north pole with snow making machines or freezers or something. At least it would get them out of our hair.
22 posted on 10/24/2003 3:25:07 PM PDT by microgood (They will all die......most of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazzo
"It is happening now. We cannot afford to wait a long period of time for technological solutions," said David Rind of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York.

Poor Davey. Just because it's happening now doesn't mean that it's being caused by humans, especially when human contribution to global warming is less than 3 tenths of 1 percent, if that is even a significant difference beyond background.
23 posted on 10/24/2003 3:27:16 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazzo
***One activity in the north is hunting of marine animals using sea-ice as a platform. When sea-ice retreats, it affects the communities up there," said University of Washington oceanographer Michael Seteele. ***

PEOPLE!!! We've got to quit using our cars so the Eskimos can hunt seals. Do it for the Eskimo children.
24 posted on 10/24/2003 3:37:19 PM PDT by irishtenor (Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati ............(When all else fails, play dead))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazzo
NASA drank the Koolaid.
25 posted on 10/24/2003 3:48:22 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Please become a monthly donor!!! Just $3 a month--you won't miss it, and will feel proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
When you consider that we are at around 300 degrees Kelvin it takes very little output change from the sun to make a big difference over the narrow range of temperatures we thrive in.
26 posted on 10/24/2003 3:48:48 PM PDT by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat

Somebody warms Barbara . . .

27 posted on 10/24/2003 3:56:22 PM PDT by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GOPgirl2000
And even if it's not, it's perfectly natural. The Vikings were farming on Greenland 800 years ago and there were palm trees growing in southern England. Then, more recently, 200 - 300 years ago, we were in the midst of the "Little Ice Age" and people were ice skating on the canals of Holland and on the River Thames. We fail to understand what a big deal George Washington's and his troops' survival at Valley Forge was - the winters were much more severe back then. Now, we are slowly coming back to normal, as the remnent of the "Little Ice Age" recedes into history.
28 posted on 10/24/2003 3:58:31 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gg188
>>"From NASA. The people who brought you the Challenger and the Columbia.<<

Yup, only 38 succesful missions between the two. Columbia flew 28 missions and Challenger 10.

29 posted on 10/24/2003 3:59:35 PM PDT by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CholeraJoe
Bump.
30 posted on 10/24/2003 3:59:41 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Un-PC even to "Conservatives!" - Right makes right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: jazzo
Muttly fix.

Everybody paints their roof WHITE...more energy reflected back up. Planets heating up, it happens, not in our control. Everybody wear white hats. Fixed.

You're welcome.

32 posted on 10/24/2003 4:05:16 PM PDT by PoorMuttly (Muttly Axiom #3..."Whoever feeds you is not to be considered food himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: belmont_mark
We fail to understand what a big deal George Washington's and his troops' survival at Valley Forge was

George Washington was encamped on his own property. He had purchased Valley Forge long before the war.

33 posted on 10/24/2003 4:05:54 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jazzo
I clearly recall in 1966 people worrying that if prices continued to rise at their present rate, we'd be paying $30 a loaf for bread by the year 2000. It's about $2 a loaf now, and people gripe, but in 1966 dollars it's about right where it was then. Pay no attention to that funny man behind the sheep.

34 posted on 10/24/2003 4:12:39 PM PDT by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazzo
Pseudo-scientific reports like this from what's supposed to be a scientific organization
point out that NASA needs a radical makeover. NASA -- stop wasting the taxpayers
money on junk science and enviromental wackos.
35 posted on 10/24/2003 5:15:27 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson