Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Here's another thread you never thought you would see on FR.

No one got sued did they for calling dirtyx42 a rapist or a liar or a murderer did they?

1 posted on 10/24/2003 11:50:50 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: Chancellor Palpatine; xsmommy; dirtboy; honeygrl
Pings.
2 posted on 10/24/2003 11:51:43 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Official Scheming Diabolical Minion of the Month.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
What you post is a reasonable accurate nutshell of the law of slander as it applies to private individuals. It is not an accurate statement of the law of slander as it applies to those who have intentionally placed themselves in the public eye.
3 posted on 10/24/2003 12:07:44 PM PDT by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
"No one got sued did they for calling dirtyx42 a rapist or a liar or a murderer did they?"

Tellin' the TRUTH ain't Slander or Libel...MUD

5 posted on 10/24/2003 12:09:10 PM PDT by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
You're killing me..lol
8 posted on 10/24/2003 12:13:54 PM PDT by hobbes1 ( Hobbes1TheOmniscient® "I know everything so you don't have to" ;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Bwahahaha!
9 posted on 10/24/2003 12:14:40 PM PDT by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Jokes about the Clintoons aren't covered.

Bill and Hillary were at the Yankee's home opener, sitting in the first row, with the Secret Service people directly behind them. One of the Secret Service guys leaned forward and whispered something to Bill.

Clinton stared at the guy, looked at Hillary, looked back at the agent, and nodded his head. Then Bill picked up Hillary by the coat collar and the seat of her pants, and threw her right over the wall onto the field.

She's kicking and swearing and screaming, and the crowd goes wild. They're cheering, applauding, and high-fiving.

Bill is bowing and smiling, when the agent leans forward and says.........

"I said ..... they want you to throw out the first PITCH!"

Want more?

Manufacturers announced today that they will be stocking America's shelves this week with "Clinton Soup," in honor one of the nation's most distinguished men. It consists primarily of a weenie in hot water.

Chrysler Corporation is adding a new car to its line to honor Bill Clinton. The Dodge Drafter will begin production in Canada this year.

When Clinton was asked what he thought about foreign affairs, he replied: "I don't know, I never had one."

American Indians have nicknamed Bill Clinton "Walking Eagle" because he is so full of crap he can't fly.

Clinton lacked only three things to have become one of America's finest leaders: integrity, vision, and wisdom.

In his recent campaigning around the country for numerous democratic hopefuls it was said that Clinton was doing the work of three men: Curly, Larry, and Moe.

Clinton's revised judicial oath: "I solemnly swear to tell the truth as I know it, the whole truth as I believe it to be, and nothing but what I think you need to know."

When asked by his aide what he wanted done about the abortion bill, Clinton replied, "Go ahead and pay it."

You know, politicians and diapers have one thing in common. Both should be changed regularly, and for the same reason.
10 posted on 10/24/2003 12:14:43 PM PDT by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
hah!!
13 posted on 10/24/2003 12:16:32 PM PDT by honeygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
"Of course, if a statement is true, there can be no action for defamation"

Oh please allow me to tell the truth.
In addition to being only the second president impeached –
although the (Spineless)Senate failed to convict and remove him from office –
Clinton was held in contempt by Judge Susan Webber Wright for having lied in her court and fined $90,686.
Clinton paid the fine.
He did not challenge the ruling.

The Arkansas court's Committee on Professional Conduct exercised the power to revoke Clinton's license as an Arkansas lawyer
(hurrah!) and to impose other sanctions.

You just can't refute the truth Billy Jeff Blythe, we won't let you!

20 posted on 10/24/2003 12:22:48 PM PDT by Pagey (Hillary Rotten is a Smug, Holier - Than - Thou Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Someone who makes TRUE statments about another can also be found guilty of slander. I remember that as a decision handed down 25-30 years ago by the SCOTUS (or the Calif Supreme Court?) when some guy who said something unflattering, but proveably true about another person was found guilty of slander and the court upheld the decision.
23 posted on 10/24/2003 12:27:42 PM PDT by ZGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Sid Blumenthal paid part of the defendant's legal costs to get out of a libel suit against Drudge.
25 posted on 10/24/2003 12:28:24 PM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Uday and Qusay and Idi-ay are ead-day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
That's OK. We're covered.

Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Opinions, as stated below this page, are allowed under freedom of expression. There's no such thing as the thought police in America. That's Democrat propaganda. No man can Constitutionally deny another the freedom of thought, i.e.,opinion (even though the government schools are notorious for getting the kids to believe it).

37 posted on 10/24/2003 1:00:56 PM PDT by concerned about politics ( Have you donated to the Salvation Army? Liberals HATE Christian organizations! Tax deductable, too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
bump and bookmark. Thanks, dubya!
40 posted on 10/24/2003 1:11:36 PM PDT by lonevoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
'Course, if you are sued, your attorneys get to hold depositions with them (the clintons) and you can pursue any line of questioning you want.

AND, if you're a public figure, it's harder to prove.

Bring it on Billary!

41 posted on 10/24/2003 1:12:22 PM PDT by theDentist (Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident; Chancellor Palpatine
The Clintons are public personages under the Sullivan vs. New York Times Rule.

Michael Schiavo may or may not be a public personage.

There, does that clear things up for you?

44 posted on 10/24/2003 1:13:09 PM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
I'm scared. I've been thinking, thinking, thinking about the lawyer George Felos, reading his words, reading his desires to kill sick and wounded people with legal hocus pocus, reading his own stories about his talks with God. I was just getting a grip on this interesting personality -- half Dr. Death, half Governor Moonbeam. He could sit on a street corner in Berkeley wearing black underwear, a purple bunny head with big floppy ears and Birkenstocks, and everybody would say nice things to him and drop coins in his cup. But now we are threatened with lawsuits and can't share our opinions and careful observations. So I won't tell you what I think of him.
48 posted on 10/24/2003 1:21:39 PM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
>> DEFAMATION -- LIBEL AND SLANDER

That was my old law firm.

49 posted on 10/24/2003 1:24:14 PM PDT by T'wit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Everything that I say about the former occupant of the White House, who held the title of President of the United States, is true, or reported by the press as a reasonably true public controversy.

We live in the United States.

A person can sue his neighbor because the neighbors dog only poops green poop, not black like normal dogs. (you can sue anybody for anything in this great land).

In other words, if you say what you believe to be the truth, - somebody may sue you, but they will have to pay your attorney's fees after they lose. They will also likely suffer a civil lawsuit in their vein attempt to conceal the truth.

It doesn't depend on any definition of the word "is", or any other commonly used English word used to decribe a psychopathic congenital liar (diagnosed by licensed psychiatric professionals), "democrat progressive" chinese communist sympathetic and treasous behavior, rape enabling, who displays pedophilic tendancies (48 yr old man admitted a tryst with a 20 yr old intern), impeached former President who lost his bar card in his home state, and is no longer is entrusted with attorney/client relationships.

To anybody who wants to sue me - bring it on. I could use the extra cash.

59 posted on 10/24/2003 3:53:35 PM PDT by PokeyJoe (Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
No...but for the life of me, why didn't the National Enquirer follow up on THIS???????

GENNIFER FLOWERS RATS OUT BILL CLINTON ON HANNITY & COLMES

I think we should FREEP the National Enquirer and ask them why they can attempt to "out" Matt Lauer and get away with it, and Rush, yet they don't go after the story behind this?????

David Kendall will probably print the emails and use them for employee T-paper!

60 posted on 10/24/2003 3:55:00 PM PDT by soozla (I'm mad as hell and I'm not gonna take it anymore!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident; All
Here is my question. Why are there two very public freepers who are trying to stifle our free speach? They shall reamin nameless, but we know who they are. Now I am sure they would sue me for slander for trying to explore the question of why are they so frightened by the free speech process ,and furhter the ability of conservatives to now organize our agenda ?

Why do people who pose as conservatives create obstacles for other conservatives ,who are fighting for a conservative belief?

It makes me wonder why a freeper would try and scare other freepers from exploring theroies, and gathering data on a topic that is most ceratinly newsworthy, political, and indeed front page news.

Anyone left around here who isn't afraid to share their thoughts on this with me?

75 posted on 10/24/2003 5:16:46 PM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross ((were it not for the brave, there would be no land of the free -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dubyaismypresident
Eh......shaddap you fat slob...go find an intern and play doctor while your equally repulsive wife slithers up next to Ted Kennedy and helps him suck down a gallon of Crown Royal on the Senate floor.

Let the litigation begin!

110 posted on 10/24/2003 6:49:05 PM PDT by Fighting Irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson