Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
You would save money on buses, lunches, and extra-curricular activities.....drivers, cooks, coaches.

And the naysayers would cry, "Look at all the lost jobs." Not really. The buses could be a private business called a bus company. They'd be assured a twice a day clientele AND they could carry others for a fee, too.

The cooks would be part of a resurgent fast food industry for those older kids going home, or for grocery workers who'd see an upsurge in sales as families brought more food into the house for lunches. Coaches would be physical fitness and club operators who would promote their sports in the community.

At least one parent would have to be home to help raise the kids, so that would decrease the work-force and drive wages up for the fewer available workers. The children would be watched and guided by their own parents....(novel concept.)

In short, the entire community would benefit, imho.

26 posted on 10/24/2003 9:17:13 AM PDT by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Great analysis, xzins! I agree!
27 posted on 10/24/2003 9:27:50 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson