Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Germans aim to grab British Nukes for EU Army
THESUN ^ | 10/24/03 | GEORGE PASCOE-WATSON

Posted on 10/23/2003 7:36:13 PM PDT by Pikamax

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: McGavin999
"someone has to PAY for developing that military."

Right, and they expect to get our past investment in bases, our past investment in armaments, and our continued investment in Nato operations.

Not gonna happen. I hope Tony is seeing through this and will not succumb.
41 posted on 10/24/2003 5:09:11 AM PDT by AMNZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I'd like to get a copy of the report and see what it says.
42 posted on 10/24/2003 7:31:51 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Hey the Frogs are a nuclear power--why not grab the force de frappe?
43 posted on 10/24/2003 8:30:18 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
Germany signed and ratified the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
44 posted on 10/24/2003 9:11:24 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Torie
They only have to worry about sustaining this level of freebies as long as they have to worry about elections...
45 posted on 10/24/2003 9:15:17 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Southack
IIRC, there was another treaty that Bonn ratified in the 1950s that renounced nuclear weapons.

Incidentally, the German signature on the NPT was caveated with a proviso favoring a the right of the Euro-Peon Union to have nuclear weapons.
46 posted on 10/24/2003 9:17:40 AM PDT by Poohbah ("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Major Vic Deakins, USAF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Agree completely.

If this is true, this is a little scary. European hegemony for Germany through Brussels?

If I were Italy and the UK, I'd be pulling up stakes.
47 posted on 10/24/2003 9:19:37 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Yep, and who cares??
That paper can be easily declared null and void by our parliament. And I promise you: this is going to happen the day after the U.S. government takes back its security guarantee (which is still valid), to defend the Federal Republic of Germany with nuclear forces in case of an nuclear attack.
48 posted on 10/24/2003 9:21:58 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
"That paper can be easily declared null and void by our parliament."

Ah, but what will the news media say about such a "unilateral" action?! What about all of the bleatings that will be heard from news commentators about Germany no longer having any respect for "international will and law"?!

< /Kidding! >

49 posted on 10/24/2003 9:28:46 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Bull$#it! Germany does not strive for hegemony, the French eventually do...
50 posted on 10/24/2003 9:29:06 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Southack
LOL, the actual reason why we have no nukes (one could wonder) is not that we lost WW2, it´s because the USA didn´t want us to have them.

In the end of the 50´s, just right after we got armed forces again, the West German government asked the parliament to allow the development of nuclear weapons.

Against the votes of the Social Democrats (they were always on the side of the losers), the permission was granted. But then, the U.S. government thought it might be not a good idea because then all the satellite states of the USSR would want nukes on their own too, so they gave us the promise to destroy all enemies who dare to nuke us. This promise is still valid (and I hope it will last many many years to come), and it´s the real reason why we don´t have nukes.
51 posted on 10/24/2003 9:34:24 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
England should just offer to sell Europe its nukes at a fair price, and that would shut them up.
52 posted on 10/24/2003 9:36:38 AM PDT by krb (the statement on the other side of this tagline is false)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
"...the U.S. government thought it might be not a good idea because then all the satellite states of the USSR would want nukes on their own too, so they gave us the promise to destroy all enemies who dare to nuke us. This promise is still valid (and I hope it will last many many years to come)..."

It's safe to say that we'll keep our military defense promises, especially in regarding to taking the opportunity to bash our foes.

The U.S. never backs down from a fight, after all (a concept that gets repeatedly lost on generation after generation of our antagonizers; Ba'athists in Iraq and Talibans in Afhganistan come to mind, for instance).

53 posted on 10/24/2003 9:40:09 AM PDT by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
Tommies = Englischers (after the Tommy guns).

Bzzzzt. Nope. Tommies = Englischers (after Tommy Atkins).

54 posted on 10/24/2003 9:41:56 AM PDT by LTCJ (Killing threads singlehandedly since June 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Southack
And despite the differences between our governments... I could never imagine that the U.S. would not strike back when somebody dares to attack the NATO territory with nuclear weapons! Deterrence must be serious and credible... I never felt that the U.S. foreign policy was not like that.
55 posted on 10/24/2003 9:44:32 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LTCJ; Cronos
And why do you call the Germans Jerries? I mean, it probably doesn´t come from Tom & Jerry, does it? :-)
56 posted on 10/24/2003 9:45:17 AM PDT by Michael81Dus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
The EU is the worse thing that could possiably happen to Great Britian
57 posted on 10/24/2003 10:04:48 AM PDT by Veritas01 (Veritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Michael81Dus
WEll, thats' what I thought when I had heard it for the first time too ;-P
58 posted on 10/25/2003 9:59:33 AM PDT by Cronos (W2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #59 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson