Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2003 4:49:07 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Ippolita
ping
2 posted on 10/23/2003 4:56:17 PM PDT by farmfriend ( Isaiah 55:10,11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: VxH
>>>Wanna read ping<<<
3 posted on 10/23/2003 4:58:27 PM PDT by VxH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
Thanks
4 posted on 10/23/2003 5:11:44 PM PDT by Raymond Hendrix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The Bible, Christianity and B.C.E. do not go together. The use of B.C.E. implies certain prejudices already in place.
5 posted on 10/23/2003 5:39:23 PM PDT by elephantlips
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The problem here is one of equivilating the Biblical Shishak with the Pharoah Sheshonq (also spelled Shishank)... perhaps, and actually probably, they were NOT THE SAME PERSON! The assumption they are one and the same exists because of two factors: the first is the "accepted" Egyptian time line that is based on the belief that Moses interacted with Ramses (2) the Great, and the second is the mere similarities in names... which are not really similar at all.

This entire problem goes away once you realize that The Saul/David stories are actually contemporaneous with the dynasty that culminated with Tut-Ankh-en-Amon, King Tut. In fact the reports of the events described in the Bible are found in the Amarna Letters, a collection of clay tablet reports from satrap kings, ambassadors and governors of the Levantine area sent to Pharoah's court. These letters include names that would be familiar to any Bible scholar... names such as Jesse, Jonathon, Lebayu (translates as "The Young Lion"... and David's adherents were caller the "followers of the Young Lion!").

The inscriptions at Karnak that list the cities conquered that includes Meggidio ALSO include Jerusalem as a conquered city... the Pharoah who accomplished that task is RAMSES THE GREAT... who was also called among his many names, SehSeh for short, which refers to the two folded bolts of cloth symbols (S) found in the cartouche of his official Royal name.

The Hebrews spoke the Egyptian "Seh" as "Sheh" or "Shah", so the Egyptian name for Ramses of SehSeh would be spoken as "Shehsheh" or "Shahshah" The keepers of the Hebrew oral tradition may not have been able to prevent themselves from adding a "KH" sound to ShehSheh(kh) which translates as "He who destroys or conquers" in Hebrew, making the name of the conquering Pharoah into a descriptive hypocoristicon of his name, a "pun" if you will. Now add in the fact that WRITTEN Hebrew (Particularly early Hebrew) does not include vowels and that vowels were a matter of opinion, it is easy to see how "ShehShehkh" was transliterated into the ShiShak of the Bible!

Incidentally, the fact that Ramses the Great conquered Jerusalem is pretty strong evidence that he could not have been the Pharoah of the Exodus... since Jerusalem had yet to be founded when those events occured.
9 posted on 10/23/2003 10:07:02 PM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
BUMP for later read.
10 posted on 10/23/2003 11:02:32 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const tag& constTagPassedByReference)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam; Swordmaker
blast from the past, no ping. Thanks Blam.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

14 posted on 12/29/2004 6:21:59 PM PST by SunkenCiv ("The odds are very much against inclusion, and non-inclusion is unlikely to be meaningful." -seamole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 75thOVI; AndrewC; Avoiding_Sulla; BenLurkin; Berosus; CGVet58; chilepepper; ckilmer; demlosers; ...
one last oldie:
Catastrophism

15 posted on 07/22/2006 11:18:44 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The greatest exposure of Stratum VI occurred in 1934, when an archaeologist named P.L.O. Guy was director of the Oriental Institute’s expedition.

Was that really his name? Funny.

NFP

16 posted on 07/23/2006 7:57:36 AM PDT by Notforprophet (Democrats have stood their own arguments on their heads so often that they now stand for nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson