Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/23/2003 6:32:51 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Pan_Yans Wife
Hmmm... isn't this exactly what checks and balances are for?????????????????????

When a law is stupid, a president (governor) does not have to sign it (can veto it). When a law is passed it can be declared unconsitutional. If a judge makes a dumbassed decision, why can't a new law be put in place to correct the judge? THIS is why there is a system of checks and balances (unlike what I heard said on the Hannity radio show and again on Fox news last night by "the Judge" who said judges shouldn't be overruled).
2 posted on 10/23/2003 7:16:39 AM PDT by Rick.Donaldson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson