Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
"Good, then let the law allow all law-oriented religious texts."

The law already does allow all those other texts, and despite your ill-based assumption, I truly have no problem with that. Please don't blame me for the fact that a predominantly Christian society expresses no urge to place statues of Buddha in front of their courthouses.

What I do object to is "the Law" (aka 'Rogue Courts') discriminating only against Christianity, in all its forms and at every turn.

Then again, Jesus did predict that this would happen over 2,000 years ago, so while I object to it, it doesn't surprise me... any more than does your judgemental venom for my fair and honest observation.

15 posted on 10/23/2003 8:01:31 AM PDT by Gargantua (Embrace clarity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Gargantua
Please don't blame me for the fact that a predominantly Christian society expresses no urge to place statues of Buddha in front of their courthouses.

So the majority gets to tell everyone else that they are living in a state that officially recognizes one belief above theirs. I thought that wasn't supposed to happen here. It's a very slippery slope.

I have a feeling those other religions don't try to put up those things because they have more respect for the beliefs of others, or they feel marginalized by the Christian majority and therefore powerless to try to get their beliefs expressed in that manner.

17 posted on 10/23/2003 8:43:25 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson