Replies

>>I'm looking for case histories, ethics opinions, a reason to disbar that lunatic. Many, many times, Felos has misrepresented Terri's condition, but I don't think that is enough to file a complaint on with The American Bar Association. Do you?

No, I see nothing he's done in Terri's case that would get him in trouble. The irregularity of sucking off her medical fund was approved by the judge. Seems very unethical on the face of it, but how does one go after a judge?
A lawyer's behavior is usually very well documented, legal search would probably be exhausting but you could probably find every client and every syllable he ever uttered in a court.
Not my field...we need a good PI. There's one in FL but his name is Schiavo, lol.
The best way to derail the lunatic Felos, IMO, is to expose him for a flake. That business about crashing a plane with his paranormal abilities, if THAT got wide attention, the media would be twirling his guts merrily down the road.
I know if I were calling into Larry King, that's what I'd discuss!
But aside from the media and the professional investigators, hopefully someone at FR has law research skills. There must be lots of disgruntled people in his wake. If he's never been sued it's a miracle.

From what I've found, attorneys don't think too many in their own field of law could be mentally incompetent.

There are cases of counsel failing to investigate the sanity of defendants, & I think an expert lawyer could turn that around to focus on Felos (Judge Greer) not investigating (as far as we know) the malpractice suit transcripts testimony, comparing 1998 to 1992, her medical records for injuries, police report, and question Michael as to why he wants his wife dead. In representing Michael, he ethically has a responsibility also towards Terri.

Michael lied at one time or the other. If he lied in 1992, that's fraud. At some time, he has committed perjury.

According to the Philadelphia Lawyer publication (no date), "Not only is the standard by which counsel is deemed effective or ineffective constantly changing, but also decisions of the higher courts have been devoid of a guideline by which future problems may be anticipated."

I have to leave now for a while. Talk later.