To: lakey
What no one has even begun to explain to me is why the protection of Terri's right to life not Constitutinal. That is THE most fundamental of rights. All else is built around that foundation.
1,771 posted on
10/23/2003 4:56:42 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: sweetliberty
"...why the protection of Terri's right to life not Constitutinal." That should read: "...why the protection of Terri's right to life is not Constitutional."
I am SO tired!
1,775 posted on
10/23/2003 5:04:31 PM PDT by
sweetliberty
("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
To: sweetliberty
I wish someone would explain to me why Terri can be starved to death when assisted suicide is not legal.
MS is predicating his actions on a claim that this is Terri's choice. That makes it a suicide they're assisting, no?
To: sweetliberty
Because it was court ordered. Our fundamental rights are quite clear in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. We have STATES' rights, over and above the dictates of the federal government.
1,872 posted on
10/23/2003 6:37:24 PM PDT by
lakey
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson