Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/21/2003 5:35:13 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum
The same people who accused Bush of killing innocent Iraqi children will be upset that he won't kill innocent American children.
2 posted on 10/21/2003 5:40:49 PM PDT by RightWingAtheist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: backhoe
fyi to index as a reply to the new charge that the Repubies and GW never do anything right.
4 posted on 10/21/2003 5:47:22 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Get a free FR coffee mug! Donate $10 monthly to Free Republic or 34 cents/day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
It's a good thing the senate bans abortion now. Abortion is nothing short of mass murder, the kind of thing for which Nazis are reviled half a century after they were themselves wiped off the planet's surface.
6 posted on 10/21/2003 5:49:15 PM PDT by Tax Government
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
The president, said Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J. "will become the first United States president to criminalize a safe medical procedure."

I wonder if Lautenberg thinks that starving a person to death is a "safe medical procedure?"

7 posted on 10/21/2003 5:56:51 PM PDT by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Anyone have the voting record? I cant seem to find it on the http://thomas.loc.gov/ website.
8 posted on 10/21/2003 6:08:00 PM PDT by hoosierboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
A little anecdotal memory.
When the RvW decision came down in the '70s, the first trimester limit seemed to be viewed by pro-lifers as arbitrary and change-able. They voiced the concern that abortion would become widespread and even be performed up to the time of birth.

Of course the pro-abort spokespeople got the message out that people should take a hard look at these fanatically stupid pro-life nuts. The aborters said they were being painted as monsters who want to kill as many children as possible and even fully developed ones at that.

What kind of credibility can you give insane religious nuts who accuse other decent people of satanic plans? After all, the aborter's primary concern was women's health.

Who could argue with that in 1976?
9 posted on 10/21/2003 6:14:12 PM PDT by martian_22 (An elephant should never forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
A number of Democrats voted for the bill. And Arnold in California has endorsed a bill modeled on the federal approach. No one wants to take control of women's bodies away from them. The majority of Congress recognized the issue is a red herring. What the U.S Senate along with the House voted to stop today was a very barbaric late term abortion PROCEDURE that ought to have no place in a civilized society.
10 posted on 10/21/2003 6:19:16 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
A number of Democrats voted for the bill. And Arnold in California has endorsed a bill modeled on the federal approach. No one wants to take control of women's bodies away from them. The majority of Congress recognized the issue is a red herring. What the U.S Senate along with the House voted to stop today was a very barbaric late term abortion PROCEDURE that ought to have no place in a civilized society.
11 posted on 10/21/2003 6:19:28 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
"I see what this is about ... this is about politics," said Boxer. "I never dreamed I'd be down here with senators who think they know more than doctors."

This isn't about what doctors know, you evil idiot. When would a 3rd trimester fetus have to be KILLED to save the life of the mother? It would just be delivered: no murder in the birth canal necessary for the mother's health.

12 posted on 10/21/2003 6:19:47 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Dems lie 'cause they have to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
""This is indeed a historic day," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., lead opponent, "because for the first time in history Congress is banning a medical procedure that is considered medically necessary by physicians.""

Just how can this c**t lie about this? She should be subjected to the same treatment.

13 posted on 10/21/2003 6:25:30 PM PDT by lawdude (Liberalism: A failure every time it is tried!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
"This is indeed a historic day," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., lead opponent, "because for the first time in history Congress is banning a medical procedure that is considered medically necessary by physicians."

Nonsense, Ms Boxer. This is not a first. They outlawed bloodletting, leeching, and snake-oil medicine many years ago. As far as that goes, physicians murdering your unborn babies was also outlawed by most civilized societies many years ago also.

19 posted on 10/21/2003 9:34:09 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Conservative by nature... Republican by spirit... Patriot by heart... AND... ANTI-Liberal by GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson