To: governsleastgovernsbest
"You can't elevate a piece of historical scripture to give it a modern significance it does not have," he said. "The Bible is the story written by us about our love affair with God," he said. This is the essence of the issue. Rather than representing the immutable word of God, Robinson looks at the Bible as man-made, something to be interpreted and changed in accordance with "modern" thinking.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Does the Bible call eating shellfish an abonimition?
5 posted on
10/21/2003 4:41:26 AM PDT by
Ronin
(Qui docet discit!)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
"the bible means what i say it means.
the bible is inviolate except those parts that i say are outdated.
the bible is the rule and guide of whatever i interpret it to be.
my ordination is more important than the church itself.
i am more important than the church itself
i am god."
that's what he sounds like to me.
12 posted on
10/21/2003 4:46:16 AM PDT by
camle
(no fool like a damned fool)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
This is the essence of the issue. Rather than representing the immutable word of God, Robinson looks at the Bible as man-made, something to be interpreted and changed in accordance with "modern" thinkingIf this is true, then most of the current Episcopal clergy should be defrocked, as most of them believe exactly this.
I thought the issue was making an unrepentant sinner a bishop, with empahsis on the "unrepentant."
15 posted on
10/21/2003 4:48:03 AM PDT by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson