Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Giuliani Warns Hillary Could Defeat Bush in 2004
NewsMax.com ^ | 10/21/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 10/20/2003 11:22:54 PM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 10/20/2003 11:22:55 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A Rudy bump!

I hope people are paying attention. Hillary will DEFINITELY run.
2 posted on 10/20/2003 11:28:04 PM PDT by Ronin (Qui docet discit!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I think Hitlery would be easier to beat than Dean or Gephardt, and I wouldn't bet on a Hitlery win, anything COULD happen.
3 posted on 10/20/2003 11:29:08 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I don't want to Raise Taxes" "I think everything must be looked at" - Jennifer Granholm. (D))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Giuliani Warns Hillary Could Defeat Bush in 2004

Asked if Sen. Clinton has enough national support to be elected president, Giuliani told Hannity, "I think you have to look at it this way, being realistic. Anybody that gets nominated could conceivably get elected. The toughest thing is getting nominated."


NewsMax strikes again.

4 posted on 10/20/2003 11:31:46 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I am hoping for a Rudy-Clinton rematch in 2006. That would be something. I think he is the one guy that could finally get her out of our collective hair and make her about as relevant in national politics as Carol Moseley-Braun.
5 posted on 10/20/2003 11:32:24 PM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
A lot of us have been saying this for months. She is a definate threat, always has been, and we must not forget that! Will Bush fight back is the question?
6 posted on 10/20/2003 11:34:39 PM PDT by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer
I don't think Rudy is interested in running for the Senate, unfortunately.

If he did, he could beat her in a NY minute.

7 posted on 10/20/2003 11:34:42 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I told my Deanite sister awhile ago: "I, as a conservative, support Dean. I want him to get the nomination, because I want him first to fight the Clintons, win the nomination, and then lose to Bush." She glumly nodded about losing to Bush - but had absolutely no clue about what I was talking about concerning the Clintons.

But it's hard to hit a moving target...now she's all gaga over Clark - with not a thought about what that means to Dean. "Dean who?" she might say. The hypnotic roboticism orchestrated by the Clintons is a frightening thing to behold.

8 posted on 10/20/2003 11:35:43 PM PDT by ctonious (Liberals look at issues strictly as Bush-bashing mechanisms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Rudy's has too much gusto and energy to be a senator. Rudy is a "doer", not a talker.

How about Attorney General Giuliani?
9 posted on 10/20/2003 11:36:01 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
GWB is his own man. He listens politely to the advice of others for a reasonable amount of time, then he moves along. There doesn't appear to be much evidence that his Directional Gyro gets tumbled by the opinions of others no matter how close they are to him. His instincts seem to be that of a consummate and dedicated winner.

Rudy's right in that the opposition should never be underestimated, but I'm sure GWB last did that when he was a teenager or in grade school. He knows the advantages of being "misunderestimated" far too well to give any opponent that advantage.
10 posted on 10/20/2003 11:38:05 PM PDT by Bobsat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctonious
But it's hard to hit a moving target...now she's all gaga over Clark - with not a thought about what that means to Dean. "Dean who?" she might say. The hypnotic roboticism orchestrated by the Clintons is a frightening thing to behold.

Yes, it is shocking the way the Democrats would blindly support a political neophyte with unknown views and who only speaks in platitiudes, simply because they believe he has the best chance of winning in the general election. Stupid donkeys. I'm glad we're not this shallow.

11 posted on 10/20/2003 11:38:05 PM PDT by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
; )
12 posted on 10/20/2003 11:49:01 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (mislead, misled, lie, lied, failed, failure,leaked, revenge, etc., etc., etc..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Rudy's trying to sucker the witch in for '04. Bush will crush her. However in '08 she could be a true contendeh as who knows who will be the GOP nominee? The GOP rarely gets three terms in succession and every time they do they blow it out their arse.
13 posted on 10/20/2003 11:54:51 PM PDT by mercy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
hillary will run, and she will give Bush a run for his money. We will be witness to the greatest, most awe inspiring display of slander, hate mongering, race baiting, and advocacy journalism in history as she is glorified and Bush is pulverized 24/7 in every way imaginable.

That being said, Bush will probably win, and there will be riots in the street.
14 posted on 10/20/2003 11:59:20 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (mislead, misled, lie, lied, failed, failure,leaked, revenge, etc., etc., etc..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
hillary will run, and she will give Bush a run for his money. We will be witness to the greatest, most awe inspiring display of slander, hate mongering, race baiting, and advocacy journalism in history as she is glorified and Bush is pulverized 24/7 in every way imaginable.

That being said, Bush will probably win, and there will be riots in the street.

There will be riots in HOMES - when somebody MIGHT stand up to the American feminist soccer slut. Or...maybe not...I've got my passport in any case.

15 posted on 10/21/2003 12:05:02 AM PDT by ctonious (Liberals look at issues strictly as Bush-bashing mechanisms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ambrose
NewsMax strikes again.

Exactly right. A non-news story.

16 posted on 10/21/2003 12:07:09 AM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KellyAdmirer; Fred Mertz
no kidding... Our best bet for getting rid of the Beast is to defeat it when it runs again for its Senate seat, and Giuliani is the obvious candidate.

But the Beast will not run in 2004 unless it *really* thinks that Bush can be beaten - or, perhaps, if it thinks that Dean stands too much of a chance of getting control of the Demonrat part yapparatus.

It really expects to make its move in 2008... and that is the worst possible scenario for us, considering the Republicans' history with Presidential successors. They will nominate whoever is "next in line", while what they should do is try to find a candidate who can defeat the Beast rather than selecting a loyal party apparatchik.

As hapless as the Republican Party has been in the past, I almost think we have a better chance of God intervening and doing away with the Beast before it can run, than we do of the Republicans saving us from It...

At least one earlier poster was so convinced that the Beast would be our next President, that he was considering moving to Mexico...

17 posted on 10/21/2003 12:17:41 AM PDT by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
."It's very, very hard to get to the point of being the Republican candidate or the Democratic candidate," he explained. "Look at all these Democrats that are killing each other to get there."

The minute Hillary Clinton enters the picture the others are gone! Maybe with the exception of one - the one she feels will do her the most good. Not the best, just the one who make her look good and will be a yes sir type.

The elected Democrats are fighting this country far harder than any foreign body. How and what the Dems are saying and doing, while we have soldiers risking and losing their lives every week, I am shamed.

Kennedy is not only a drunken, fat, ugly, old man, he and his party are driven with hate and are desperate. Desperate men make mistakes.Keep it up old man, you only hurt your party.

It is only with the media's help have they gotten as far as they have. My faith has to be in the citizens. I still yell at the screen when I hear 'the American people want-----

18 posted on 10/21/2003 12:17:43 AM PDT by malia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If she runs, it will be because she has something up her sleeve...something we cannot see at the moment. Watch out for her...she's wicked.

19 posted on 10/21/2003 12:41:29 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler
there will be riots in the street

A rrrrrriot...ees and ugly..ting!

20 posted on 10/21/2003 1:17:57 AM PDT by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson