Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/20/2003 9:36:26 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway
Wonder if Frist and Co. will *finally* get serious about breaking a filibuster. I'm hoping they've just been waiting for a "diverse list" to us as P.R. to present to the American public -- Hispanic, black woman, white woman, etc. I'm going to be discouraged beyond words if they let Rogers go down without a fight too.

Thanks for posting this, I always enjoy Dr. Sowell.
2 posted on 10/20/2003 9:40:38 PM PDT by GOPrincess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; Black Agnes; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

9 posted on 10/20/2003 11:01:49 PM PDT by nutmeg (Rush Limbaugh: The Voice of Sanity during 8 years of the Clinton Reign of Terror)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; nutmeg
In the country at large, the real issue behind all the sound and fury is that special interest groups like "People for the American Way" want judges to impose items in the left-wing agenda that cannot be imposed through the democratic process.

Or as Rush put it in number 26 of his "Second Edition - 35 Undeniable Truths of Life "Liberals attempt through judicial activism what they cannot win at the ballot box."

Also, to all PA FReepers, remember, if Snarlin' Arlen Specter wins the Republican primary, and gets re-elected, he will Chair the Senate Judiciary Committee. This would give the Liberals exactly what they want.

We can do better! Vote Pat Toomey for U.S. Senate.

12 posted on 10/21/2003 3:57:33 AM PDT by cuz_it_aint_their_money (Specter named “Worst Republican Senator” by National Review’s J.J. Miller. Vote for Toomey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Hopefully the anti-Christian - anti-God senators will get sent packing in the next election.

Voting these "commies" out of office is what "Christians" and those who stand "FOR" the Constitution have a duty to do.

SEND a message for the rest who are not up for election that they cannot keep their positions of "POWER" if they will not follow the Constitution.
13 posted on 10/21/2003 4:15:17 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Trueblackman
Time for another visit to PFAW's offices?
15 posted on 10/21/2003 5:02:28 AM PDT by sauropod (Fry Mumia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
She sounds like a "keeper" to me. I hope the Senate pubbies stand up like men and get her approved.
17 posted on 10/21/2003 6:42:08 AM PDT by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Have you seen anything by anybody, anywhere, defending Janice Rogers Brown?

Nope.

It looks as if the bigots are getting set to easily carry the day, once again.

It must be frustrating to be in the majority when these pesky things constantly get in the way of your tee time.

18 posted on 10/21/2003 7:34:28 AM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Considering that Rove had a key role in picking Frist, I'm beginning to see this kind of nomination as a cynical ploy, tossing a bone to conservatives, with all the meat already picked clean.

We've had nearly four years of a Republican president, and nothing substantial has been done about the judiciary. At this rate, all we'll get is a pack of hungry Souters.

19 posted on 10/21/2003 8:46:21 AM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Brown is a tough cookie. She's gonna make mincemeat of the Dems when they try messing with her. Not a snowball's chance in hell her confirmation will be derailed.
20 posted on 10/21/2003 9:31:55 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
What the left-wing can never forgive her for is upholding the right of California voters to ban racial quotas.

So that's the issue. I thought it might be something like that. Progressive rage against "counterrevolutionaries" who threaten what they consider won ground borders on the insane.

Sowell BTT.

21 posted on 10/21/2003 9:39:56 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: hobbes1
ping
23 posted on 10/21/2003 11:10:41 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Huge bump!
24 posted on 10/21/2003 11:11:26 AM PDT by k2blader (Haruspex, beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
The real question is whether the administration that nominated Justice Brown will mount a serious counter-attack or leave her out there, twisting in the wind, the way it did with Miguel Estrada and its other judicial nominees.

I'll wager on twisting in the wind for $500, Alex.

31 posted on 10/21/2003 8:54:28 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway; farmfriend; Jeff Head; Willie Green; sauropod; madfly; editor-surveyor; DoughtyOne
    Leading the charge against Justice Brown, as it did against Judge Bork 16 years ago, is the grossly misnamed organization "People for the American Way." This is a far-left group with only contempt for American traditions and culture. They want judges who will dismantle the Constitution of the United States........
........More than 4.5 million Californians voted for Proposition 209, which outlawed group preferences and quotas. But liberals wanted the state Supreme Court to overrule the voters. Janice Rogers Brown refused and instead wrote the majority opinion upholding the voters' right to make the laws under which they live.
    The real question is whether the administration that nominated Justice Brown will mount a serious counterattack or leave her out there, twisting in the wind..........
===============================
Guys, As another writer wrote, "Diversity for groups like 'People for the American Way.' is only 'skin deep'." I would add, "If that!"

This would be a good time for the Bush administration to stand up. This woman believes in property rights and limited government. Peace and love, George.

36 posted on 10/23/2003 3:06:44 AM PDT by George Frm Br00klyn Park (FREEDOM!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Because Justice Brown is black and conservative, she is being denounced as "another Clarence Thomas." Like Clarence Thomas, she is also being denounced as "unqualified" by people who have never read a word she wrote. Anyone who does read Justice Brown's opinions will discover a wealth of knowledge, a command of logic and an unflinching honesty about the law and about some efforts of her colleagues to compromise legal principles.
 
Nothing new under the sun.....................
 
 
Psalms 11
 1.  In the LORD I take refuge. How then can you say to me: "Flee like a bird to your mountain.
 2.  For look, the wicked bend their bows; they set their arrows against the strings to shoot from the shadows at the upright in heart.
 3.  When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do ?"
 4.  The LORD is in his holy temple; the LORD is on his heavenly throne. He observes the sons of men; his eyes examine them.
 5.  The LORD examines the righteous, but the wicked  and those who love violence his soul hates.
 6.  On the wicked he will rain fiery coals and burning sulfur; a scorching wind will be their lot.
 7.  For the LORD is righteous, he loves justice; upright men will see his face.

37 posted on 10/23/2003 4:40:00 AM PDT by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson