[Sofa King]

"I have offered an alternative hypothesis that will remain as or more credible as your hypothesis until you can explain the benefit al-Queda realized by cooperating with Saddam Hussein by sharing operational information, which is a significant deviation from the SOP of a terrorist group."

You mean you want it explained to you AGAIN? Somehow, the fact that you're slow on the uptake doesn't surprise me. Try re-reading posts #60, #65, and #38 a couple dozen times. If you still can't understand it, then just admit that you're too stupid to be debating politics and stop wasting FR's bandwidth.

"Al-Queda and Iran represent the same type of threat -- Islamic fundamentalism. The fact that you don't appear to understand the connection speaks to your ignorance on this issue."

The only ignorance here is your pathetic over-simplification of middle east politics. You're too ignorant to understand that things have changed since 1980 (before America was enemy #1, before a little thing called Desert Storm) and you're too ignorant to grasp the differences between Iran and Al-Queda (hint: One is a nation, the other is a terrorist organization).

"I have answered your questions repeatedly. Your discomfort with my answers does not alter that reality."

No, you never answered the question that I asked you in response to your question, and it is no more of an inappropriate waste of time than yours.

[GoGophers]

You mean you want it explained to you AGAIN? Somehow, the fact that you're slow on the uptake doesn't surprise me. Try re-reading posts #60, #65, and #38 a couple dozen times. If you still can't understand it, then just admit that you're too stupid to be debating politics and stop wasting FR's bandwidth.

I am finished wasting my time debating you. You seem impervious to logic so further discussion would be irrational.