[fly_so_free]

"cameras have been banned from her room"

er, uh, I wasn't talking about asking for permission- you know what I mean? (wink)

I did hear about the video/picture ban imposed by the judge-but- doesn't that indicate the judge is biased too? The whole argument is over wether she's a vegtable or not, wether she can be rehablilitated or not, right? Judge/husband say she is, so what's the big deal if her parents want to take pictures/video- what's the judge afraid of if she's "a vegtable"? Oh, and why not make a copy of that video and put it on a big screen outside the Hospice-project it onto a wall or something? So everyone can see supposed "vegtable" Terri smiling at her mom.

Pray for Terri-she needs a miracle

[supercat]

I did hear about the video/picture ban imposed by the judge-but- doesn't that indicate the judge is biased too?

When it comes to matters of fact, you need to understand two rules:

1. The trial court is always right.
2. When the trial court is wrong, refer to rule #1.
   Judge Greer has declared that he is not biased and refused to recuse himself. Therefore, he is not biased and need not recuse himself.