Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mortgage Meltdown?
Safemoney Report ^ | 18 Oct 2003 | Martin Weiss

Posted on 10/18/2003 1:29:50 PM PDT by sourcery

A funny thing happened last week. Mortgage rates remained basically unchanged, inching up just 2 basis points to 5.81% from 5.79% a week earlier, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association of America. But demand for refinance loans and purchase loans dropped. Like a rock.

This was not your garden-variety drop. It was a huge plunge: Applications for refi loans sank more than 22%. Applications for purchase loans crashed 19%.

Refinance applications are now down MORE THAN 75% from their late-May peak while purchase applications are at their lowest level since April.

What's going on? It's pretty obvious ...

* The big reason consumers were rushing to refinance their mortgages until May of this year was FALLING mortgage rates. Whenever rates fell another notch, it generated a new crop of mortgage refinancing. But when rates STOPPED falling, the new demand began to dry up. And now, although mortgage rates did not rise very much in the most recent week, they are still up 75 basis points (three quarters of a percent) from the multi-decade lows set in the spring. That's killing the mortgage refi boom.

* When mortgage rates were falling, new home buyers could thumb their noses at rising home prices. "So what if the house is more expensive?" they said. "As long as our monthly payments are lower, who cares?" Now, though, the price increases of the past five years are finally going to cause sticker shock. Indeed, during that period, personal income rose 23% while the average price of a new home jumped 27% and the average price of an existing home skyrocketed 39%.

Combine the two factors -- higher mortgage rates AND higher home prices -- and the result is a significant jump in monthly payments. That means big trouble for the housing market.

Remember: The mortgage boom is what powered demand to the frothy bubble level where it still rests today. Now, what will happen as the mortgage boom comes to an abrupt end? What will be the impact on the rest of the economy?

Consider this scenario ...

* Higher mortgage payments end the boom in home sales ...

* Home prices stagnate and then actually begin to decline ...

* Homeowners can no longer easily tap into their home equity ...

* A huge source of new cash into the economy -- for spending or even stock market investing -- dries up ...

* Real estate, mortgage and construction industries -- among the few that were ramping up their hiring -- start shedding workers ...

* The real estate industry drops many of the 64,000 jobs it has added since May 2000 ... the construction industry drops many of its 70,000 ... and the credit intermediation industry (which includes mortgage lenders) drops a big portion of the nearly 250,000 jobs added since 2000.

* All industries that feed off of a booming housing market -- furniture, carpeting, home appliances and more -- fade quickly.

* The entire consumer economy sinks, setting off a chain reaction of declines in virtually every industry.

This won't happen tomorrow. But as long as mortgage rates continue moving up, it's hard to imagine how it can be avoided in the months ahead. And whether this scenario starts unfolding now or next year, it's certainly not too early to take protective action: Reduce your debt. Avoid sinking more money into investment real estate. Build liquid cash, regardless of how low the current yield may be.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: buygoldfromme; chickenlittle; goldbuggery; mineshaft; mortages; pleasebuymygold; refinancing; skyisfalling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
To: arete
I haven't seen denial/mania at this level of intensity since late 1999.
21 posted on 10/18/2003 2:48:24 PM PDT by sourcery (Moderator bites can be very nasty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
You thought such rates were here to stay, perhaps?

We're back down into the 5's on the 30-Year Fixed, with rates being pushed up by signs of a stronger economy. Thing is, there is no inflation and THAT'S what drives interest rates.

22 posted on 10/18/2003 2:50:30 PM PDT by Phaedrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
"You thought such rates were here to stay, perhaps? "

No but the rates are tied to the growth of money, as well as the demand for money. It is not necessarily ordained that they go higher at this point.

23 posted on 10/18/2003 3:01:24 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Phaedrus
there is no inflation and THAT'S what drives interest rates.

Interest rates are a function of a) inflationay expectations, b) perceived credit risk, and c) the supply of lendable captial relative to demand. So in a deflationary debt collapse such as we are about to experience, interest rates can rise to the sky as perceived credit risk rises, and as the supply of lendable capital implodes due to the "multiplier effect" operating in reverse as debts are liquidated. Inflation is not the only determinant of interest rates.

24 posted on 10/18/2003 3:05:26 PM PDT by sourcery (Moderator bites can be very nasty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
It is not necessarily ordained that they go higher at this point.

Well, when you put a pot of water on the stove, and turn the burner on high, it's theoretically possible that the water will freeze instead of boil. But's it's not likely.

25 posted on 10/18/2003 3:08:19 PM PDT by sourcery (Moderator bites can be very nasty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN; sourcery; arete
Why does the article assume higher mortgage rates?

Because very strong fundamental macroenomic forces are pushing rates higher. Examples: US trade deficits, US budget deficits.

Because interest rates cycle from high to low to high--and we've just passed the low point for this cycle. Rates have already reached historic lows.

It is also the the cost of the risk premium likely to be charged to the GSE's when they hedge their MBS portfolios.

See also: Contradictions: The Fed vs. the Bond Market

What Fannie and Freddie do is what good hedge funds should do. They go into the futures market to hedge their interest rate directional risk. You see, if short term rates were to rise above the average rates they have lent to their long term mortgage buyers, they could find themselves in the position of losing money. Lots of money. So they hedge.

They do this in the Eurodollar futures markets. They use swaps or options on swaps called swaptions. (Swaptions are options contracts which, in return for a one-off premium payment, give you the right to enter into a swap agreement at the option expiration.) Again, nothing wrong with this.

Bianco notes the problem lies in that they need over a Trillion Dollars (that's with a "T") of these derivatives. In order to get a trillion dollars to line up on the other side of the trade (to take the risk from Fannie and Freddie), they have to pay a premium. Apparently it may be a big premium.

Bianco argued at lunch, in the shadow of the Chicago futures markets, that it is not the expectations of bond traders for actual rate increases, but the massive need for Fannie and Freddie to hedge its portfolio that drives the Eurodollar rates.

The mortgage debt market is now larger than the government debt market. One can make an argument it is the most significant piece of the US economy. Why take any risk at all?

Yet, if Bianco is right, the bond market sees more than a little risk, and that is why interest rate futures are priced so high in the face of the Fed telling us rates are going nowhere. If there were no risk to this trade, there would not be such high risk premiums.


26 posted on 10/18/2003 3:10:59 PM PDT by Starwind (The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
"Well, when you put a pot of water on the stove, and turn the burner on high, it's theoretically possible that the water will freeze instead of boil. But's it's not likely"

LOL, Well the economy is improving although it's questionable yet how much. That certainly argues for higher rates.

But what is happening on the monetary side? And adequately growing money supply will keep rates low despite the economic growth. I'm asking. I haven't looked at the monetary figures in a couple of years.

27 posted on 10/18/2003 3:11:43 PM PDT by DannyTN (Note left on my door by a pack of neighborhood dogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Who cares about mortgage rates when...Lurking beneath Yellowstone National Park is one of the most destructive natural phenomena in the world: a massive supervolcano.

28 posted on 10/18/2003 3:14:44 PM PDT by jetson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I think many are missing the point of the article, including the author.

The last 2-3 years the US manufacturing economy has taken a dive as have many other sectors. We have avoided a really bad recession though because of rates being driven down.
The low rates have:

A) Allowed many to lower their mortgage payments, with the savings being spent on consumer goods, keeping the economy afloat.

B) Increased employment in the banking and financial services sector through the sheer number and velocity of transactions (both residential and corporate finance)

C)Allowed many to build or construct (or build something bigger) since the low rates made projects more affordable. This has kept the construction industry busy.

The low rates have been good medicine, but now the effect is starting to wear out. Something else has to pick up in the economy, as we lose the benefits of A, B, and C above.



29 posted on 10/18/2003 3:15:56 PM PDT by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: The Mayor
17% was my rate in 1980, thankyou jimmy carter.

But if you had cash in the bank, it was great fun! Right around that time is when we, the little people, began to be allowed to open Individual IRAs...I had my first couple in the 15 to 16 percent area.

All the savings institutions loved to advertise with those little charts showing us how quickly we'd have a zillion bucks if just stuck with making an annual IRA contribution for 20 or 30 years.

Now, I can't get 2 percent.

30 posted on 10/18/2003 3:17:01 PM PDT by ErnBatavia (Why do the Flag postage stamps peel off upside down..infiltrators?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Shanty Shaker
Your comment only makes sense if you assume that the Fed will attempto reduce interest rates in the face of a slowdown in the mortgage market. Otherwise, what is the connection between mortgages and interest rates?
31 posted on 10/18/2003 3:19:25 PM PDT by bt_dooftlook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Sounds like Bush pi$$ed in his oatmeal, or a bitter guy who missed the bottom mortgage rates .. He predicted Dow at 5000 by May '03 and advised his followER to sell last Nov.. Aweeeeee better put some ice on that.. @)
32 posted on 10/18/2003 3:20:27 PM PDT by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I haven't seen denial/mania at this level of intensity since late 1999.

Neither have I. I have serious doubts if most people have any idea of what the consequences are going to be. Short term memory loss or attention deficit disorder I suspect.

Richard W.

33 posted on 10/18/2003 3:22:27 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SteveAustin
The low rates have been good medicine, but now the effect is starting to wear out.

Not good medicine at all. The artificially low interest rates have managed to obscure and exacerbate underlying economic problems while prviding temporary and illusionary feel good doses of consumerism to the public. It has turned into a full blown ponzi scheme with ever increasing amounts of quick fix borrow and spending to keep it looking good and the public placated. Meantime, manufacturing jobs and real productive activity is leaving town. Misguided and irresponsible bubble economics that can only end badly.

Richard W.

34 posted on 10/18/2003 3:38:17 PM PDT by arete (Greenspan is a ruling class elitist and closet socialist who is destroying the economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: arete
I don't really disagree with you, but as Keynes said, in the long-run we are all dead. So juicing the economy via the rates probably delayed the inevitable, but at least it kept things humming for 3-4 more years.

I don't think things will collapse, but I could see a 1978-1982 period of high rates and high unemployment until we reinstate fiscal discipline and work through the Chinese and Indian cheap labor situations.


35 posted on 10/18/2003 3:46:32 PM PDT by SteveAustin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Were new home starts up or down for Sept from Aug...
36 posted on 10/18/2003 3:52:43 PM PDT by tubebender (FReeRepublic...How bad have you got it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Mattress Man!!!!!
37 posted on 10/18/2003 3:56:51 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery; A. Pole
This whole rant ignores demographics.

A big factor in home buying the number of new households.  With divorce prevalent (typically causing one spouse to start a new household) and no slowing of immigration, the demand for homes will continue on an upward trend.

Refinancing naturally slows down after so many have already refinanced!  It takes a 2 point differential to really make it worthwhile.

38 posted on 10/18/2003 3:58:51 PM PDT by Incorrigible
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender; sourcery
Were new home starts up or down for Sept from Aug...

U.S. Sept housing starts rose 3.4 pct

39 posted on 10/18/2003 4:01:21 PM PDT by Starwind (The Gospel of Jesus Christ is the only true good news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Consider this scenario ... [snip]

* Homeowners can no longer easily tap into their home equity ...

IMHO, not necessarily a bad thing. Too many folks wasting their home equity on vacations, etc.

40 posted on 10/18/2003 4:04:55 PM PDT by upchuck (This Tag Line be blank on porpoise :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson