Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: genefromjersey
Nobody knows for sure, but the usual opinion is that Muhammed was a pagan Arab who had spoken with Jews and Christians and was familiar with the Bible at second hand. Islam is partly based on the Bible, but gets a lot of the facts, as well as the theology, wrong.
19 posted on 10/18/2003 2:04:07 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Cicero
Some future civilization may comment that all religion was merely a representation of a prolonged cultural adolescence.
22 posted on 10/18/2003 2:11:04 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Cicero
Nobody knows for sure, but the usual opinion is that Muhammed was a pagan Arab who had spoken with Jews and Christians and was familiar with the Bible at second hand. Islam is partly based on the Bible, but gets a lot of the facts, as well as the theology, wrong.

Quite correct. It's also aimed squarely at the Arabs -- telling them they are grand folks. It was an Arab nationalist movement. Even now, Arabs are considered to be better Muslims than other Muslims and the Koran can only be read in Arabic. The Koran contains such inaccuracies as stating that Abraham was to sacrifice ishmael not Isaac and that Christ was born under a tree in the desert (obviously Mo heard about Reveleations but didn't hear about the Gospels). It's mostly contradictory too. But it contains one command -- anyone who doubts this book is to be killed. Pretty good way of preventing criticism.
63 posted on 02/17/2004 6:13:48 AM PST by Cronos (W2K4!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson