[Maria S]

Maybe someone can answer a couple of questions I've had about this case:

1. Is it true that there is very little money left (from any insurance policy on Terri) and her husband has nothing to gain from her death?

2. Is it true that, although her husband says it was her wish to die (if she should be in a comatose state) even though she left no physician's directive...it was just her words to her husband?

3. If there is no money or other benefit coming to Terri's husband at her death, why on earth should he mind if her folks took over her care?

This is one WEIRD case!

[Schwaeky]

There is indeed a 1.6 mil settlment, may or may not still be there, but the insurance policy is substantial. But even so, he gains her silence eternally from any chance of prosecution against him... That is a murder.

plus such has to be in WRITING.. it wasn't, therefore SOL....

but there is money, when she dies, he becomes an instant millionaire...

[nothingnew]

How much work would a whitehouse work if a whitehouse could do work?

FMCDH

[dalebert]

after so many rears he wants his freedom? Maybe he could just get a divorce.

[supercat]

Maybe someone can answer a couple of questions I've had about this case:

Soitenly.

1. Is it true that there is very little money left (from any insurance policy on Terri) and her husband has nothing to gain from her death?

Much of the Terri's trust fund has been looted; it's unclear how much remains. On the other hand, if she ever gets another guardian that person could demand an audit of the trust fund. Such audit would land Felos, Schiavo, and possibly Greer in prison.

2. Is it true that, although her husband says it was her wish to die (if she should be in a comatose state) even though she left no physician's directive...it was just her words to her husband?

More likely it was her husband inventing such a claim out of thin air.

3. If there is no money or other benefit coming to Terri's husband at her death, why on earth should he mind if her folks took over her care?

If anyone other than Schiavo becomes Terri's guardian, Schiavo and Felos, and possibly Greer, go to prison for embezzlement. If Terri ever recovers and can remember some of the things that have happend in the hospital or hospice, Schiavo and possibly Felos go to prison for attempted murder. If it can be proven that these people committed and condoned perjury to have her killed, the go to jail for an attempted murder conspiracy.

Those seem like pretty sound reasons to me.

This is one WEIRD case!

It also highlights a major problem of the current legal system: a judge is selected before the first case dealing with a particular matter; any challenge to the selection must happen before the first case is heard. Once the selection is made, all future cases dealing with that matter go before the same judge. Appeals courts are bound to accept that judge's findings as fact, even when they are contradicted by 99.44% of the evidence.

Even before the Schindlers stepped into the courtroom for Schiavo's first custody hearing, the fix wa already in. The only reasons Terri hadn't been murdered before are (1) Terri survived earlier attempts on her life; (2) Schiavo et al. didn't think starvation would be necessary.

Something needs to be done to limit trial courts' inescapable power over cases.

[G.Mason]

Here Read away ............. Terri Schiavo:


FLORIDA APPEALS COURT UPHOLDS
ORDER TO REMOVE SCHINDLER-SCHIAVO FEEDING TUBE

http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/SchindlerSchiavo061303.html

---

Sept. 2nd 2003 U S District Court Tampa

http://www.accessiblesociety.org/topics/independentliving/schiavo.html

---

Will to live project:

http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/willtolive/StatesList.html

http://www.nrlc.org/euthanasia/willtolive/FL.htm



On or about August 30, 2003:
Links to Documents:
Father's Affidavit http://www.zimp.org/robert.pdf
Federal Order http://www.zimp.org/order.pdf
Affidavit C. Johnson http://www.zimp.org/johnson.pdf
Affidavit H. Law http://www.zimp.org/Heidi.pdf
Affidavit C. Iyer http://www.zimp.org/carla.pdf



( Bush tries?)

Posted on Thu, Oct. 09, 2003 http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/local/states/pennsylvania/counties/chester_county/6966709.htm
“Bush argued that to remove the feeding tube without first trying to get Terri Schiavo to eat and drink on her own would violate her right to life under the Florida and federal Constitutions.”

---

October 16th Legal Opinion Letters sent to Governor Bush:

http://terrisfight.org/downloads/More.pdf
http://terrisfight.org/memorandum.html
http://terrisfight.org/memorandum2.htm
http://terrisfight.org/memorandum3.htm



Timeline of the Terri Schiavo case

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/news/content/ap/FL_Comatose_Woman_Timeline.html

[RGSpincich]

3. If there is no money or other benefit coming to Terri's husband at her death, why on earth should he mind if her folks took over her care?

Maybe he's telling the truth about her wishes.

[hedgetrimmer]

No its not so weird. The lawyer is looking for a big case to set a presidence for active euthanasia. There was a case in Australia that aussie lawyers and euthanasia advocates used to get pro-euthanasia laws on the books. The case is eerily similar to Terri's. If the lawyer writes a book on the case, and some say he already has, the spouse will get money from it. The case is meant to open the door to active euthanasia in this country.