Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/17/2003 9:40:10 PM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hillary is letting the New York Times get the "fluff" pieces out to the public as she prepares to run for re-election in 2006. If she wins, she'll definitely be a prime presidential aspirant in 2008.
2 posted on 10/17/2003 9:42:58 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This article acknowledges that people dislike Hillary. It can't possibly be from the Times.
3 posted on 10/17/2003 9:43:08 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A Wary Mrs. Clinton Runs a Perpetual Race

I don't see how she can run in those pantsuits. Doesn't Bill have an old pair of jogging shorts she can wear?

4 posted on 10/17/2003 9:43:34 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
think there are an equal number of people who want to throw her through a brick wall," said one senior Democratic strategist.

What? Who? ROTFL!

Hillary is running for President, not Senator from NY. Looks like the Times would love nothing better!

6 posted on 10/17/2003 9:46:24 PM PDT by ladyinred (Talk about a revolution, look at California!!! We dumped Davis!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
He noted, for example, that a poll his organization conducted in late September found that Rudolph W. Giuliani, who is considering a run against Mrs. Clinton in 2006, would handily defeat her, 57 percent to 40 percent.

Hmmmmmm.....boy, I don't think she has a choice but to run for President in 2004. Obviously if Guiliani kicks her ass in 2006, he will kick her ass when he runs for President in 2008.

She's not going to wait until 2016 to run for President do you think?

7 posted on 10/17/2003 9:48:05 PM PDT by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"There are a large number of people out there who would run through a brick wall for her, but I also think there are an equal number of people who want to throw her through a brick wall," said one senior Democratic strategist.

Oh, no. It's not an equal number... try many times over number would like to throw her through a brick wall.

8 posted on 10/17/2003 9:54:58 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"There are a large number of people out there who would run through a brick wall for her, but I also think there are an equal number of people who want to throw her through a brick wall,"

All of the above sounds good to me. Kill two birds with one brick wall, so to speak.

9 posted on 10/17/2003 9:55:25 PM PDT by hobson (The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
None of this matters if this story turns out to be true:

Clinton's Fall Guy May Turn the Table - Peter Paul

Hope springs eternal... :-)

10 posted on 10/17/2003 10:01:18 PM PDT by hotpotato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
with her re-election campaign more than three years away, the junior senator from New York is acting like a candidate on the run, embarking on the kind of furious bout of campaigning normally found with a politician who is trailing in the polls.

Why not? She learned that from her wife, Billy Jeff Pervert. People don't like me? I'll fix that, I'll go on the campaign trail and find some that do! ABCCBSCNNNBC will cover it for me! And if they still don't like me, I'll run to Europe! They LOVE me over there! Screw doing my actual job!

11 posted on 10/17/2003 10:11:17 PM PDT by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
And not one word about the days and days she has spent away from her desk traipsing all over the country signing her "book" for her precious dronettes.

This thing lives for one reason and one reason only, to be POTUS.

12 posted on 10/17/2003 10:37:58 PM PDT by upchuck (This Tag Line be blank on porpoise :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
...a lot of voters really dislike her

Voters? How about your everyday average person who has a sense of of morals who really isn`t too hip about having a bonafide sociopath in the White House? She comes into New York with absolutely no qualifications whatsoever to run for Senator, never mind that she never lived in nor had anything ever to do with New York, nor had any history in an elected position in politics before, and immediately puts the people of that state she is running in, in danger by ordering her husband to pardon FALN terrorists who bombed NYC and Chicago130 times, even before she is even elected! All so she can buy votes from a bunch of misguided idiots! And what did these terrorists say to her husbands offer that he would pardon them if they renounced violence? They refused! Screw you pal! They refused to renounce violence! And what happened? He pardoned them anyway! Pardoned them even though most were sentenced to life, pardoned them even though they only served 15 to 20 years, pardoned them even though they never asked to be pardoned nor ever apologized for what they did! And this is how she treats just one state? And they are considering this sick woman for President? Are you out of your f------g mind? And does anyone for one second believe that this woman is doing anything but campaigning right now? Do you honestly think she has been on this "book signing tour" for the past six months just to sell freggin` books? Her Presidential campaign started the second she decided to run for Senator of New York! And when is she ever IN New York?? It`s either to do a TV show, or march in a parade. How many funerals did she attend for NYC firemen and cops killed on 911? ZERO! NYC fag parades are more important to her than those who gave their lives that day. Every other politician in NY state has attended those funerals, Guliani 200++, every one except Hillary Clinton. Why? Because she is a SOCIOPATH! That is not an insult, IT IS A FACT! And this is who they want to be the first female President? This is the best that the human female race can come up with?

Profile of a Sociopath



13 posted on 10/17/2003 11:45:13 PM PDT by metalboy (Liberals-Nuke `em from orbit. It`s the only way to be sure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"Voters are sophisticated enough to know that this kind of speculation is not based on her performance in the Senate," said a Democrat close to the Clinton camp. "They know it's based on what many people see as her personal ambition. And she has to be careful about that because her personal ambition is what fuels the negative perceptions of her."

Some voters, but not the New York Times, are sophisticated enough to know that anti-Hillary hostility has less to do with Senate performances and personal ambitions and more to do with her record in the White House 1993-2000, including the selling of defense secrets, pardoning of domestic terrorists and drug kingpins, grand jury perjury, the use of thugs to intimidate, the use of lawyers to assert spurious executive privileges, and other "gated" corrupt enterprises, as well as their Final Days of pandering and purloining.

Giuliani could become New York's patron saint if he were to run against Hillary in 2006 and thereby rescue us from our stupidity here in the Empire State. This threat may drive Hillary into the 2004 race where she can be put out of our misery once and for all. She would lose both the election and her potential power and influence. To paraphrase Churchill, there is nothing more exhilarating in life as to have your opponent shot at with result.

17 posted on 10/18/2003 7:05:56 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Doctor Raoul; kphockey2; mrs_kphockey2; LaserLock; Oschisms; hellinahandcart; rmlew; Yehuda; ...
Nota bene
21 posted on 10/18/2003 7:33:24 AM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Her approval rating among all New Yorkers appears to be higher than ever — 61 percent in a poll earlier this month.

One of three New York voters, for example, recently told pollsters for Quinnipiac University that they have an unfavorable opinion of her...

Okay, which is it? I thought the Quinnipiac poll results had a much higher negative number than one in three...more like 60%. Does anyone remember?

And she has to be careful about that because her personal ambition is what fuels the negative perceptions of her.

Sorry, Slimes. She can't hide that personal ambition underneath a multitude of spongy pantsuits because it's her entire being, what she perceives as her purpose in life, her destiny.

22 posted on 10/18/2003 8:46:56 AM PDT by arasina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson