Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sick, wounded U.S. troops held in squalor
UPI ^ | Oct. 17, 2003 | MARK BENJAMIN

Posted on 10/17/2003 2:10:36 PM PDT by tomball

FORT STEWART, Ga., Oct. 17 (UPI) -- Hundreds of sick and wounded U.S. soldiers including many who served in the Iraq war are languishing in hot cement barracks here while they wait -- sometimes for months -- to see doctors.

The National Guard and Army Reserve soldiers' living conditions are so substandard, and the medical care so poor, that many of them believe the Army is trying push them out with reduced benefits for their ailments. One document shown to UPI states that no more doctor appointments are available from Oct. 14 through Nov. 11 -- Veterans Day.

"I have loved the Army. I have served the Army faithfully and I have done everything the Army has asked me to do," said Sgt. 1st Class Willie Buckels, a truck master with the 296th Transportation Company. Buckels served in the Army Reserves for 27 years, including Operation Iraqi Freedom and the first Gulf War. "Now my whole idea about the U.S. Army has changed. I am treated like a third-class citizen."

Since getting back from Iraq in May, Buckels, 52, has been trying to get doctors to find out why he has intense pain in the side of his abdomen since doubling over in pain there.

After waiting since May for a diagnosis, Buckels has accepted 20 percent of his benefits for bad knees and is going home to his family in Mississippi. "They have not found out what my side is doing yet, but they are still trying," Buckels said.

One month after President Bush greeted soldiers at Fort Stewart -- home of the famed Third Infantry Division -- as heroes on their return from Iraq, approximately 600 sick or injured members of the Army Reserves and National Guard are warehoused in rows of spare, steamy and dark cement barracks in a sandy field, waiting for doctors to treat their wounds or illnesses.

The Reserve and National Guard soldiers are on what the Army calls "medical hold," while the Army decides how sick or disabled they are and what benefits -- if any -- they should get as a result.

Some of the soldiers said they have waited six hours a day for an appointment without seeing a doctor. Others described waiting weeks or months without getting a diagnosis or proper treatment.

The soldiers said professional active duty personnel are getting better treatment while troops who serve in the National Guard or Army Reserve are left to wallow in medical hold.

"It is not an Army of One. It is the Army of two -- Army and Reserves," said one soldier who served in Operation Iraqi Freedom, during which she developed a serious heart condition and strange skin ailment.

A half-dozen calls by UPI seeking comment from Fort Stewart public affairs officials and U.S. Forces Command in Atlanta were not returned.

Soldiers here estimate that nearly 40 percent of the personnel now in medical hold were deployed to Iraq. Of those who went, many described clusters of strange ailments, like heart and lung problems, among previously healthy troops. They said the Army has tried to refuse them benefits, claiming the injuries and illnesses were due to a "pre-existing condition," prior to military service.

Most soldiers in medical hold at Fort Stewart stay in rows of rectangular, gray, single-story cinder block barracks without bathrooms or air conditioning. They are dark and sweltering in the southern Georgia heat and humidity. Around 60 soldiers cram in the bunk beds in each barrack.

Soldiers make their way by walking or using crutches through the sandy dirt to a communal bathroom, where they have propped office partitions between otherwise open toilets for privacy. A row of leaky sinks sits on an opposite wall. The latrine smells of urine and is full of bugs, because many windows have no screens. Showering is in a communal, cinder block room. Soldiers say they have to buy their own toilet paper.

They said the conditions are fine for training, but not for sick people.

"I think it is disgusting," said one Army Reserve member who went to Iraq and asked that his name not be used.

That soldier said that after being deployed in March he suffered a sudden onset of neurological symptoms in Baghdad that has gotten steadily worse. He shakes uncontrollably.

He said the Army has told him he has Parkinson's Disease and it was a pre-existing condition, but he thinks it was something in the anthrax shots the Army gave him.

"They say I have Parkinson's, but it is developing too rapidly," he said. "I did not have a problem until I got those shots."

First Sgt. Gerry Mosley crossed into Iraq from Kuwait on March 19 with the 296th Transportation Company, hauling fuel while under fire from the Iraqis as they traveled north alongside combat vehicles. Mosley said he was healthy before the war; he could run two miles in 17 minutes at 48 years old.

But he developed a series of symptoms: lung problems and shortness of breath; vertigo; migraines; and tinnitus. He also thinks the anthrax vaccine may have hurt him. Mosley also has a torn shoulder from an injury there.

Mosley says he has never been depressed before, but found himself looking at shotguns recently and thought about suicide.

Mosley is paying $300 a month to get better housing than the cinder block barracks. He has a notice from the base that appears to show that no more doctor appointments are available for reservists from Oct. 14 until Nov. 11. He said he has never been treated like this in his 30 years in the Army Reserves.

"Now, I would not go back to war for the Army," Mosley said.

Many soldiers in the hot barracks said regular Army soldiers get to see doctors, while National Guard and Army Reserve troops wait.

"The active duty guys that are coming in, they get treated first and they put us on hold," said another soldier who returned from Iraq six weeks ago with a serious back injury. He has gotten to see a doctor only two times since he got back, he said.

Another Army Reservist with the 149th Infantry Battalion said he has had real trouble seeing doctors about his crushed foot he suffered in Iraq. "There are not enough doctors. They are overcrowded and they can't perform the surgeries that have to be done," that soldier said. "Look at these mattresses. It hurts just to sit on them," he said, gesturing to the bunks. "There are people here who got back in April but did not get their surgeries until July. It is putting a lot on these families."

The Pentagon is reportedly drawing up plans to call up more reserves.

In an Oct. 9 speech to National Guard and reserve troops in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, Bush said the soldiers had become part of the backbone of the military.

"Citizen-soldiers are serving in every front on the war on terror," Bush said. "And you're making your state and your country proud."
 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: fortstewart
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: MineralMan
Thanks for the actual report from someone who has been there. Is it just the Guard that has these antiquated facilities, or are they common throughout the base?

No, those conditions are only at the National Guard Training Center. The rest of the post has modern facilities.

101 posted on 10/17/2003 5:20:35 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of All Who Threaten It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: judicial meanz
To be honest, I havent heard anyone talk about the Air Force experience.

I don't think this would have happened in the AF to be honest (to this extent at least). One reason being the AF seemed to do a better job of retention when it came to medical staff, while, IMO, it seemed like many in the medical profession in the Army were there doing their time so the Army would pay for their training/college, and they had no desire to make a career out of the military.

Unlike the Army, a higher percentage of those exposed to combat/extreme conditions are going to be officers and middle-senior NCOs, and you can take it to the bank that this would never have happened to a group of them. Yes, it shouldn't matter if it's an E-2 or an E-6 or an O-1 that is wounded. Of course you wouldn't have large groups, because outside of a base coming under attack, the majority of those in the AF that would be injured would be few since usually you either completed your mission in one piece or you didn't come back.

It's sad, it sucks, and it shouldn't matter, but because the AF was always top-heavy with officers due to the nature of our mission and the fact that most bases were operating around the clock (things never felt like "peacetime" to me), we always seemed to have better facilities.

102 posted on 10/17/2003 5:25:40 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
My best friend in the USN wanted to go to OCS, but was turned down. He later got out, went to a state military college, and reenlisted in the USAF as an officer.

I spoke to him about it recently, and he told me it was the best move of his life. He said the difference between being a submariner and an Air Force officer was like night and day.

This guy was a great NCO, made plenty of tough deployments, drew hazardous duty pay for must of his enlisted life, and spent about 300 days a year deployed when in the USN, and now he claims his life is similar to being in a large corporation, and having a good job. he says he wouldnt part with it for the world.

Like I said....I really messed up big time..LOL
103 posted on 10/17/2003 5:30:37 PM PDT by judicial meanz (Fry Arafat....baste him in Pig grease...and bury him upside down in a a manure pile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
Like your prof, I also recommend the Air Force to young men and women. The Army simply doesn't value its people, especially enlisted people. And that is based on 8 years active, 8 Reserve, and 8 Guard -- and counting.

Not to turn this into an AF vs Army argument, but I've often believed that the AF valued its people much higher than the Army (especially its enlisted).

Part of it maybe that we required longer commitments upon enlistment or commission, and part of it maybe that we have a larger ration of very technical/skilled people (hence the longer enlistments).

A lot of enlisted jobs in the AF, they could require a lot of education, hence a large investment and not as easy to replace as quickly, while (according to relatives) the Army saw a lot of more of its people as being, for lack of a better phrase, easily replaced.

You can't just replace somebody that works on and with nuclear weapons, and when you have weapons systems that are around 50 years old (B-52s, etc.) you sure as hell do not want to lose the institutional knowledge that senior NCOs accumulate.

104 posted on 10/17/2003 5:34:33 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
"Good leadership and consistency. If senior officers simply treated soldiers like human beings it would be a humongous step forward. But if you just lead soldiers well, they will follow you through any hardship. And if you are visibly even-handed and consistent with it, they'll love you for it."

Tell it, brother. Why don't the leadership schools emphasize just that?

105 posted on 10/17/2003 5:35:44 PM PDT by 91B (Golly it's hot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: tomball
"Now my whole idea about the U.S. Army has changed. I am treated like a third-class citizen."

Desert the army, repudiate your citizenship, and sneak over the border as an illegal immigrant. Then you can get first-class medical care. I'm sorry, the country really is that screwed up. Oh, and it doesn't help to vote, because judges can rule every word in the Constitutional unconstitutional.

Billions to protect Iraq, not one penny for protecting the US border!

106 posted on 10/17/2003 5:38:52 PM PDT by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomball
Oh sure,

the author is just trying to make the point that the taxpayers are donating 167 Billion to a country that harbors terrorists

yet

cannot care for it's own soldiers.

What a crackpot.
107 posted on 10/17/2003 5:39:13 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Not necessarily white, or a guy.............Or AM I???????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Not at any US base where I was stationed. Every barracks had latrines indoors. What bases were you at that didn't? When?

I've slept in the snow in Norway...had to get out of the pup tent to take a leak.

1st Combat Comm Gp. Wiesbaden W. Germany '79-'82

108 posted on 10/17/2003 5:48:17 PM PDT by NeonKnight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
True. Very well said.
regards,
109 posted on 10/17/2003 6:02:48 PM PDT by Thunder 6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob
IG, then their Congressman is the usual route, especially for a Reserve guy. Normally, that wakes up the chain of command. Nothing brightens the day like a Congressional Inquiry!
regards,
110 posted on 10/17/2003 6:07:07 PM PDT by Thunder 6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Bollocks. I dealt with these kinds of conditions you can deal with it too. The world doesn't get any softer just because current generations of American youth do.

Conditions bad or conditions normal, the quarters are not the issue.

It may be normal to wait weeks for medical care, but it isn't right, and it doesn't make it good policy.

I wouldn't be upset if they were housed in tents and told to dig their own latrines, but they damned well should recieve prompt medical care. At least as prompt as a General Officer stationed at the Pentagon would recieve. After all, they are the real soldiers.

So9

111 posted on 10/17/2003 6:29:07 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
The solution is simple really. Send them back to their home stations, or the nearest military medical facility, then call up a bunch of reserve and guard doctors, nurses and other medical personel to take care of them. I'm sure it could be done on a voluntary active duty basis, or in some cases on a inactive duty basis, and you'd get plenty of volunteers.
112 posted on 10/17/2003 6:39:19 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
would like to note in reference to this particular post on my part- at his age group, 17 minutes is quite a respectable time.

IOW you didn't engage your brain before putting your fingers in gear. Common problem, but at least you fessed up to it.

113 posted on 10/17/2003 6:43:12 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: been_lurking
Priority was always given to active duty, then activated reserve, then reserve, then Guard, then retirees on a space available basis,

That's fine if the activation is for training, but when it's for real, they become active duty soliders and should be treated as such. Do you think all the Guard Divisions called up for "the duration" in WW-II were treated as second class soldiers? I very much doubt it, and if they had been, there'd have been hell to pay.

114 posted on 10/17/2003 6:47:05 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9
Conditions bad or conditions normal, the quarters are not the issue. It may be normal to wait weeks for medical care, but it isn't right, and it doesn't make it good policy.....but they damned well should recieve prompt medical care. At least as prompt as a General Officer stationed at the Pentagon would recieve. After all, they are the real soldiers.

It may not be normal to wait weeks for medical care but it does happen. As an example I had a shipmate who hurt his back, we were on mainland Japan, the closest specialist was stationed on Okinawa. Unfortunately he was on 30 days leave. Now the military could have sent the guy with the bad back to Hawaii but it was more costly to fly him there. So guess what? He waited over a month to see the doctor, it happens, may not make sense but that's the way it is. And if you think junior personnel are going to get the same prompt treatment as a General Officer your living in la la land!!! It ain't going to happen.

115 posted on 10/17/2003 6:56:10 PM PDT by Terp (Retired US Navy now living in Philippines were the Moutains meet the Sea in the Land of Smiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
They don't count the votes of military people anyway, right? So, no ramifications to pissing them off..

But reservists and other "non lifer" types are different, they vote and they don't forgive and forget very well either.

. In the Air Force, we didn't wear unit insignia on our uniforms, with some exceptions such as a ball cap to be worn with fatigues (pre-BDU days) and command level patches on those fatigues as well. But on our blues, no unit insignia. So most of the time, if you didn't already know, you couldn't tell the reservists from the active duty guys, except the reservists tended to be a bit older, and a bit more competant for their rank or grade. One former reserve CO of mine was not particularly amused when, when acting for the head of Intell at PacAF at a PacCom meeting of some sort, during a stint of active duty "for training", to have some active duty puke (non-AF I think) making some smart ass remark about reservists, especially since he outranked the puke. On top of being an O-6, he is an Aggie. Definitely was not amused, neither was the puke after the Colonel straightend him out. :)

116 posted on 10/17/2003 7:06:32 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Tragically Single
I believe you.
117 posted on 10/17/2003 7:11:04 PM PDT by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
Thanks for your comments.

Airman attached to army units get squalor pay (I'm sure the bureaucratic name for it isn't that honest). That is depressing to hear!

I know some folks deride the "Chair Force" because their basic training is the shortest and they can run slower than the other services, but if we put soldiers and marines in mortal combat, the least we can do is let them live as well as airmen when they're home.
118 posted on 10/17/2003 7:25:29 PM PDT by Maximum Leader (run from a knife, close on a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Oh, well, if it's not NEW then it must be OK.
119 posted on 10/17/2003 7:25:40 PM PDT by ivegotabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
By now the commander of Fort Stewart will have thrown a tantrum and the tantrum will be making its way down the chain of command with the inevitability of gravity.

Yeh, but they don't really belong to him, and could give a F-word. Meanwhile they do belong to someone, someone who should be raising bloody hell. That's one difference with Guard and Reserve folks, they have a long time attachement to their units, which is good and bad, but mostly good and something the Regular forces could emulate a bit. During the early Afghanistan business, some Air Guard units sent their First Shirt, even though they were only sending a "slice" of their unit. The Command Senior NCO then reported back to the CO about how "his" people were being treated, and hell was raised as appropriate.

120 posted on 10/17/2003 7:32:55 PM PDT by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson