Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: PatrioticCowboy; All; Consort; finnman69; TomB; RLK
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy; Remole; seamole; rwfromkansas; Nefertiti; mystery-ak; Crystalrozes
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy; Arkinsaw; Alia; AntiGuv
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy; Truth666; Windsong
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy; Eaker; elbucko
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy; arete; BlackVeil; ex-Texan
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy
As any regular reader of the Stars and Stripes can attest, that rag has always been a megaphone for the the sadsacks and yardbirds.
To: PatrioticCowboy; Salo; SAMWolf; SJackson
ping
To: PatrioticCowboy
To: PatrioticCowboy
Instead, 49% of those who answered the newspaper's questionnaire rated the morale of their unit as low or very low, 49% said it was unlikely they would re-enlist, and 31% said they thought the war had not been worthwhile. In other words, 1/2 of those who answered the questionnaire (what was the response rate, I wonder?) said their morale was high or very high, 51% said it was likely they would re-enlist (what's the normal re-enlistment rate during peacetime?) and a WHOPPING 69%, over 2/3, in other words, a SUPER-MAJORITY, thought that the war has been worthwhile.
13 posted on
10/17/2003 11:05:15 AM PDT by
wimpycat
(Down with Kooks and Kookery!)
To: PatrioticCowboy
By the way, this was already posted and discussed a couple of times yesterday.
To: PatrioticCowboy
I can understand some of the gripes from the Reserves and the Guard units, (mainly for the hardships at home caused by the call up) but it is war, and one is expected to carry out their duties. (Note, many of the units called up were units that are no longer fully manned in the Army i.e. Civil Affairs Units.) Lucky for them it isn't for "the duration" as it was for those in WWII. When we volunteer we don't volunteer to serve for a specified period in any particular theater. We just can't say: "Its getting rough and fustrating I think I'd like to go home now". Hopefully help is on the way, and I would still like to see those Japanese troops take over the prisons!
17 posted on
10/17/2003 11:06:26 AM PDT by
Bringbackthedraft
(Hillary where are you today? What have you personally accomplished for NY?)
To: PatrioticCowboy
This just doesn't pass the smell test.
To: PatrioticCowboy
Here is actual text of the part of the poll that was taken:
¶ Asked about their personal morale, 34 percent overall rated it as low or very low, 27 percent said it was high or very high, and virtually all the rest called it average. Perceptions of their units morale ranked heavier on the low side. This question of personal morale elicited widely different responses among the services. Reservists ranked their morale as the lowest by far. Marine and Air Force respondents tended to rate their own morale on the high side, while Army respondents were fairly evenly divided between high and low morale, with most falling in the middle, or average.
This actually means that 66% find it average to very high.
This means that the spin put on this story by the press is, once again, misleading.
24 posted on
10/17/2003 11:07:58 AM PDT by
illiac
To: PatrioticCowboy
I can't believe this. And here I thought that troops loved participating in wars and never questioned them at all. Well, if troops are unhappy, I guess we hafta call the war off, those are the rules. It's inconceivable that the U.S. should ever participate in a war in which one or more troops are unhappy. Other countries? sure. But the U.S. Army is only designed to fight blissfully delightful wars in which the troops' hearts are filled with joy and flowers. Therefore, Bush needs to call off this thing and bring the troops home (since some of them, the ones who were interviewed/surveyed for this article, are not happy).
That's the way it works in the U.S.A. It's how we got to be such a big superpower.
To: PatrioticCowboy
Typical selective reporting of facts from the liberal media.
Anyone who wants to read the full accurate story from S and S click here:S&S
Here's a sample of some of the S&S story:
"Of those surveyed: ¶
Many Reserve and National Guard respondents said they were unhappy with a number of things, just as letter writers from those units had said in letters to the newspaper. They said they often felt like second-class soldiers who dont receive the same equipment, support and treatment as their active-duty counterparts.
¶ When asked how worthwhile they thought the war in Iraq was for the United States, the split among all those responding was 67 percent saying it was worthwhile, probably worthwhile or very worthwhile, with 31 percent saying it was of little value or of no value at all.
¶ Asked about their personal morale, 34 percent overall rated it as low or very low, 27 percent said it was high or very high, and virtually all the rest called it average. Perceptions of their units morale ranked heavier on the low side. This question of personal morale elicited widely different responses among the services. Reservists ranked their morale as the lowest by far. Marine and Air Force respondents tended to rate their own morale on the high side, while Army respondents were fairly evenly divided between high and low morale, with most falling in the middle, or average.
¶ Of all troops surveyed, 72 percent rated living conditions average or better. But disparities existed throughout the region. One Army unit could have three hot meals a day and another unit with the same mission subsisted on MREs and rationed bottles of water. Some units, although they had been in Iraq for months, still hadnt had a day off or access to a hot shower. Other troops had been in Iraq a few weeks and were already being allowed to leave on morale trips.
The numbers show that sometimes camp conditions and morale are not always connected. Some Marines surveyed in southern Iraq live in austere conditions but still had overall high morale."
29 posted on
10/17/2003 11:10:30 AM PDT by
JimVT
To: PatrioticCowboy
You forgot to post this:
"...These cost more lives than the American losses in Vietnam (58,135), but not as many lives as five years of murder in America (119,700 killed 1990-94). Or another way of looking at it, each atrocity on this page killed roughly the same number of people as a single year of medical mistakes in the USA (44,000 to 98,000). ..."
http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/warstat4.htm
30 posted on
10/17/2003 11:11:48 AM PDT by
Matchett-PI
(Why do America's enemies desperately want DemocRATS back in power?)
To: PatrioticCowboy
NEWSFLASH*****SOLDIERS BITCH*******
32 posted on
10/17/2003 11:13:36 AM PDT by
.cnI redruM
(The September 11th attacks were clearly Clinton's most consequential legacy. - Rich Lowry)
To: PatrioticCowboy
I saw the guy who conducted this poll discussing it on TV last night. He said morale among reserves/national guarsmen was relatively low (not a surprise at all - they've been yanked out of their regular lives for a substantial amount of time, and probably have financial challenges thanks to it). But morale among the active duty was very good, especially among the Marines and Air Force. Overall, from how he was talking, the numbers were quite impressive. Let's face it. They're in a combat zone, a stifling desert, the R&R program had not yet started and tours were being lengthened at the time the poll was conducted. But of course this rag and the Wash Post will do their best to portray the negative, thereby adding to the threats and challenges our fighting forces face every day.
33 posted on
10/17/2003 11:13:38 AM PDT by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: PatrioticCowboy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson