Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Militia member 'filled with rage,' plotted ambush
The Grand Rapids Press ^ | Friday, October 17, 2003 | Ed White

Posted on 10/17/2003 10:29:17 AM PDT by FourPeas

Militia member 'filled with rage,' plotted ambush

Friday, October 17, 2003

By Ed White
The Grand Rapids Press


It was a rural arsenal fit for war.

After the peaceful arrest of a Cadillac-area man, authorities who searched his 40-acre compound discovered a stunning collection of firepower, including an anti-aircraft gun capable of firing 550 rounds per minute up to four miles away.

A van and a Jeep Cherokee, described by the suspect as his "war wagons," had machine guns inside, with one "locked, loaded and ready to go," Assistant U.S. Attorney Lloyd Meyer said.

Agents found an underground bunker, thousands of rounds of ammunition, hundreds of pounds of gunpowder and manuals on guerrilla warfare, "booby traps" and explosives.

There were chilling pictures of President Bush and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld with the cross-hairs of a high-

see MILITIA, A4

powered rifle scope drawn over them, Meyer said.

Norman Somerville, 43, was arrested last week on federal gun and drug charges as he shopped at Home Depot in Cadillac. Authorities then spent the weekend combing his property in Wexford County's Antioch Township, about 20 miles northwest of Cadillac.

Details of the search were disclosed in a court document filed Thursday in federal court in Grand Rapids, four days before a judge will decide whether Somerville should remain in jail while his case is pending.

Somerville was "filled with rage and intended to ambush people, mowing them down in a hail of machine-gun bullets," Meyer said, quoting informants. He belongs to a "self-styled radical militia unit" whose members are upset over the death of Scott Woodring, the prosecutor said.

Woodring was the Newaygo County man fatally shot by state police during the summer, days after a trooper died while trying to serve him with an arrest warrant.

State police were told in September that Somerville wanted to cause a car accident, then "ambush and kill" any responding officers with a machine gun mounted in his Jeep, Meyer wrote in the court document.

An unidentified source, described as one of Somerville's "trusted associates," feared he had become "mentally unbalanced and would kill an innocent person or be killed," Meyer said.

Somerville may face additional charges linked to the search of his property, although Meyer declined to elaborate.

Two years ago, Somerville moved to Wexford County from elsewhere in northern Michigan. He served in the Army from 1978 to 1984 and was trained as an intelligence analyst assigned to the elite Special Forces.

During a brief court appearance last week in Grand Rapids, Somerville said: "The people will have their day. ... There's a quiet civil war going on in the country."

In Antioch Township, five miles outside Mesick, neighbors said he is not the type to share a cup of sugar.

"We told our kids to stay off his property. There was gunfire a lot," said Lynda Sherburne, a former township clerk who lives nearby. "Who knows where the stray bullets are going.

"He got angry very easily. No contact with him was the best contact."

Sherburne said her nephew's house shook as state and federal authorities detonated explosives found on Somerville's property.

"I don't think anyone realized he was stockpiling back there," she said.



TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-497 last
To: af_vet_1981
Your positions are so far out of step of the American political fabric that they are damaging to the conservative movement.

What would a liberal democrat like you know about "conservative?" If you think you're a conservative, you need to up your medication. Your viewpoint vis a vie firearms is dead on with the Democratic party/Sara Brady. Do you live in New York City? If not, you should. they all think just like you do there, and as evidence they elected upChuckie Schumer and Hitlery Clinton. Democrats are socialists/liberals, not conservatives.

Since you are (deludedly) claiming that "conservatives" want more gun control, and upChuckie Schumer, Fat Teddy Kennedy, Diane Feinslime all want more gun control, then by your bizarre "logic" they are all conservatives. I understand that you hate and fear guns, freedom and love big government. Many people do, but don't try and pass yourself off as a conservative because you ain't.

481 posted on 11/03/2003 3:41:59 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
I am a conservative Republican. You are someone who wants to extend 2nd Amendment rights to tanks, aircraft, and Weapons of Mass Destruction. I can't believe you expect anyone who is normal to take you seriously.
482 posted on 11/03/2003 4:07:00 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I am a conservative Republican

LOL. You are nothing of the sort unless Schumer, Feinstein, Kennedy, Waxman, Clinton, Rangel, McCarthy etc are also conservative Republicans. What you are is either a lying troll from DU or a totally self-deluded statist and to be pitied. On second thought you might be a Republican. There are hard left statist Republicans, McCain and Chaffee come to mind. But conservative? No way. Conservative my a$$.

I got a little history lesson fer ya, liberal. Until 1934 there were no restrictions of any sort on any arms that could be possessed by citizens of the US. The artificial concept of "destructive device" as something that the BATF uses for an excuse to harass citizens didn't come into effect until 1968. The 1994 semiauto ban is just 9 years old. So until relatively recently Americans did have the freedom to select weapons of all sorts. SO yes historically speaking and constitutionaly speaking, the second amendment means just what it says, and outside of NYC and the Peoples' Democracies of CA, RI, MA, NJ, IL and MD people do believe the Bill of Rights means what it says. (Except for you)

483 posted on 11/03/2003 4:40:29 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 482 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Now the the shoe is on the other foot it makes a difference?

From the view of the Secret Service - no it doesn't make a difference.

And I really doubt that you can find a picture of any President (past or present), with cross hairs, that hasn't been pulled by a moderator.

484 posted on 11/03/2003 4:55:04 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Thank you for confirming that you are arguing for Weapons of Mass Destruction for any citizen as part of the 2nd Amendment. The issue is crystal clear.
485 posted on 11/03/2003 5:51:56 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
483 posted on 11/03/2003 4:40 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)

I hadn't noticed your signature until now. I recommend you obtain spiritual help before we read something bad about you in the news.

486 posted on 11/03/2003 5:54:55 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 483 | View Replies]

Comment #487 Removed by Moderator

Comment #488 Removed by Moderator

To: af_vet_1981
I hadn't noticed your signature until now. I recommend you obtain spiritual help before we read something bad about you in the news.

Ah yes the sanctimonious hypocrisy of the left. I suggest you stop lying to the rest of us (and maybe yourself too for all I know) and come out of the closet and revel in your liberal communism. Or do you still contend that your identical beliefs to Schemer, Feinstein, Rangel, Waxman, Kennedy, Clinton, etc make you a "conservative republican" just like they are? You must think everyone else on this forum is pretty dumb if you think that we're going to believe that someone (that would be you) who has stated his belief in the Democratic party platform is a "conservative republican".

That had to have been the Soviet air force. I would recommend that you get help, but there isn't any know cure for your condition. Just keep reading and believing the "conservative republican" editorial pages of the Washington Post and the LA Times. You echo their sentiments.

489 posted on 11/03/2003 6:47:19 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 486 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
I can see that you yet have nothing to offer to this discussion which, even accidentally, smacks of logic and reason.

However, I will say again, for possible penetration, that ANY politician, no matter WHERE they are from, who wants power over me and wants me disarmed is utterly unworthy of being trusted as DOG CATCHER. And any drooling sycophant of theirs harbors an agenda which will not bear the scrutiny of daylight. And if I mangle their name, RAT Liberal, it is because they wish to mangle the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and it is better to mangle their names than to threaten to (or actually) mangle THEM, even if it is deserved. But you go on deluding yourself that you are a Conservative and get all incensed at those of us who really WANT to conserve the Constitutional Republic the founders handed us. And even as the Marine Corps has bailed your nasty a$$es out of many a sticky situation in the past, I guess I can afford to do it one more time. But if you persist in declaring yourself enemy to the Republic and the Constitution, you can be sure it'll be the LAST time you get bailed out.
So. Now you have it. A politician or its drooling sycophant who does not want to trust me to own ANY arm of my choice is not worthy of my trust or ANYONE ELSE'S trust. If I should, for whatever reason, MISUSE that arm, I am surely subject to punishment, should I survive. But ownership and possession are guaranteed (not granted) by the Second Amendment to the Constitution for the United States and that is NOT subject to interpretation by the DiFi's or the UpChucks of the nation, OR their toadying minions. OK, Minion?
490 posted on 11/03/2003 11:08:50 AM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 480 | View Replies]

To: dcwusmc
A politician or its drooling sycophant who does not want to trust me to own ANY arm of my choice is not worthy of my trust or ANYONE ELSE'S trust.

Fortunately the vast majority of the American people, as well as the Armed Forces do not agree with you. I hope you find a way to mitigate the madness you are proposing without hurting others. Does your church share your view that WMDs are for any citizen who wants them ?

491 posted on 11/03/2003 1:54:30 PM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
Slap? what do those do?
492 posted on 12/08/2003 10:44:06 AM PST by Joshh86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
That (300 win mag) is a "high powered sniper rifle"
493 posted on 12/08/2003 10:50:03 AM PST by Joshh86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
My dad has to get the local police chiefs approval every time he purchases a cap n ball revovler here in mich.
494 posted on 12/08/2003 10:51:44 AM PST by Joshh86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Joshh86
"Permit to purcharse". If you want to own a pistol you need to go to the police or sheriff(where I went for my .45) station and get the background check. Then I used that to get the gun, which I took back to the sheriff's department for a 'safety inspection'(Registration).

Thank the Klan back in the 1920's for that law.

495 posted on 12/08/2003 10:58:17 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("if you wanna run cool, you got to run, on heavy heavy fuel" - Dire Straits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 494 | View Replies]

To: Joshh86
SLAP = Saboted Light Armor Penetrator - Pretty successful in .50 BMG. These are .22 or .25 cal tungsten penetrator in plastic sabot. Just how a stryker would fare against these is probably classified, but I have no doubt that they'd chew up a m113. I read on the rbcd website (table since removed) that their version of this ammo had a muzzle velocity of 5900 fps. Also heard that they aren't as accurate as .50 BMG ball.
496 posted on 12/08/2003 11:21:17 AM PST by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 492 | View Replies]

To: from occupied ga
T/y

P.S. stryker looks pretty tough
497 posted on 12/08/2003 11:43:24 AM PST by Joshh86 (wanted gau/8 in jeep compatible mount)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480481-497 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson