Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Democrats Cannot Win
Hour Eleven ^ | October 15, 2003 | Doug Hagin

Posted on 10/16/2003 5:01:48 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
Let's hope we stay the course!
1 posted on 10/16/2003 5:01:49 PM PDT by Lando Lincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
The democratic party is dying and the DNC knows it.
2 posted on 10/16/2003 5:04:49 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
As long as the Democratic Party allows the influence of George McGovern and Bill Clinton to prevail, they'll remain in the political wilderness. I say "Good!"

-Regards, T.
3 posted on 10/16/2003 5:09:48 PM PDT by T Lady (.Freed From the Dimocratic Shackles since 1992)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
more special interest groups. Maybe white christian males. Are they a minority yet? Maybe the dims can recruit that minority.
4 posted on 10/16/2003 5:13:32 PM PDT by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
white christian men will always be a scapegoat. If they ever become a true oppressed minority it will not matter since they would be a minority and oppresed.
5 posted on 10/16/2003 5:14:44 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
The dems can't win.
Bill Klinton couldn't win twice...just no way.
John Engler couldn't win on the GOP side.
There's no way Bush could win West Virginia.
There's no way the GOP would win statewide in Georgia.

Get the drift?

6 posted on 10/16/2003 5:21:24 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("I don't want to Raise Taxes" "I think everything must be looked at" - Jennifer Granholm. (D))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I hope all the weeping,wailing Freepers (and we DO have them) will get to see this.
7 posted on 10/16/2003 5:24:13 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
I agree with this great article on everything except one point. The dimrat party does have goals, just read the communist manifesto to see what they are. The cowards and liars in the rat, and other parties will never quit until they are in total control. We will just have to keep them in check.
8 posted on 10/16/2003 5:25:55 PM PDT by vpintheak (Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
True unless John Templeton's prediction comes true, then all bets are off.
9 posted on 10/16/2003 5:31:44 PM PDT by RichardW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T Lady
McGovern and Clinton? How about Mao, Lenin, and Stalin? That's their true influence.
10 posted on 10/16/2003 5:34:22 PM PDT by Marauder (We need Joe McCarthy now more than ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Nice screen name
11 posted on 10/16/2003 5:35:30 PM PDT by LandofLincoln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

12 posted on 10/16/2003 5:37:52 PM PDT by geedee (The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness, can be trained to do most things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
You left the lying liberal media out of your equation!
13 posted on 10/16/2003 5:39:12 PM PDT by SwinneySwitch (Liberalism is a Sin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
How can I be so certain of a Democratic loss?

Never "gloat", or you may "bloat".

You need to tone it down son! We have time to win this thing but you don't need to go rubbing it in their faces before we win! You might get them all excited & they'll swarm out & sting us in the face.

We will win because we are right. We will win but it takes time. Don't be too impatient.

14 posted on 10/16/2003 5:45:08 PM PDT by jrushing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
There once was a Federalist party. No more.

Let's hope the same fate is in store for the Democratic party.

15 posted on 10/16/2003 5:55:10 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Somebody needs to go post this puppy at DU.

Tia

16 posted on 10/16/2003 5:57:20 PM PDT by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Oh, I'm not so sure about that at all. As SwinneySwitch just pointed out, there is still a preponderance of liberal partisanship in the "mainstream" media - that's what's been working on the "Bush Lied" mantra since the lads and ladies of the 101st and the 3d ID humiliated them by (gasp!) "going through them like crap through a goose." (Patton would have been proud.) That's why the constant din of "quagmire."

That's also why the unbelievable dirt was tossed just prior to the California elections. That little septic-tank-in-the-fan was brought to us courtesy of the national DNC, a la Terry McAuliffe and the Clintons. I absolutely guarantee everyone on this board that that was a tuneup for next year this time, when a bigger game is afoot.

The Democratic Party is about negatives, not positives.

That's natural enough for a party in minority - in the runup to the election their main job is to paint as black a picture of the status quo as necessary to make people less critical about the proposed changes. But there have to be proposed changes for it to work. There have to be programs, and so far there is very little to show in that direction, and it's getting late in the game. What slid Clinton by in '96 was his co-option of the Contract With America after having bitterly criticized its provisions during the previous two years; were it not for stealing Gingrich's, he'd have had no programs at all, and he was in power at the time! The point is that that sort of omission is permissible (barely) for an incumbent but not for a non-incumbent. The Dems had better pay heed or this one will be a wash despite the media.

17 posted on 10/16/2003 6:08:54 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
May The Democratic Party with its support of abortion support fulfill its own Liberal Death Wish.
.
18 posted on 10/16/2003 6:35:38 PM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Hey, who could ever disagree?! There is now way, for example, Hitlery could ever win a dogcatcher race in New York State. much less a Senate seat! Hurray for Senator, whatsisnameagain? Oh yes, Senator Lazio!
19 posted on 10/16/2003 6:42:51 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Far out, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: victim soul
Yep, between homosexuals packin fudge and abortions, liberals will become extinct shortly.

Sooner than later I hope.

20 posted on 10/16/2003 6:44:23 PM PDT by Texas Deer Hunter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson